The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Normalization method for metabolomics data using optimal selection of multiple internal standards
Open accessAbstract
Background: Success of metabolomics as the phenotyping platform largely depends on its ability to detect various sources of biological variability. Removal of platform-specific sources of variability such as systematic error is therefore one of the foremost priorities in data preprocessing. However, chemical diversity of molecular species included in typical metabolic profiling experiments leads to different responses to variations in experimental conditions, making normalization a very demanding task. Results: With the aim to remove unwanted systematic variation, we present an approach that utilizes variability information from multiple internal standard compounds to find optimal normalization factor for each individual molecular species detected by metabolomics approach (NOMIS). We demonstrate the method on mouse liver lipidomic profiles using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry, and compare its performance to two commonly utilized normalization methods: normalization by l2 norm and by retention time region specific standard compound profiles. The NOMIS method proved superior in its ability to reduce the effect of systematic error across the full spectrum of metabolite peaks. We also demonstrate that the method can be used to select best combinations of standard compounds for normalization. Conclusion: Depending on experiment design and biological matrix, the NOMIS method is applicable either as a one-step normalization method or as a two-step method where the normalization parameters, influenced by variabilities of internal standard compounds and their correlation to metabolites, are first calculated from a study conducted in repeatability conditions. The method can also be used in analytical development of metabolomics methods by helping to select best combinations of standard compounds for a particular biological matrix and analytical platform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue
Zhang, Y., Proenca, R., Maffei, M., Barone, M., Leopold, L., & Friedman, J. M. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372425a0 · Cited by 13,419
The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Aitchison, J. (1986) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0 · Cited by 4,383
van den Berg, R. A., Hoefsloot, H. C., Westerhuis, J. A., Smilde, A. K., & van der Werf, M. J. (2006) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-142 · Cited by 2,450
Cited by
A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization
Mestdagh, P., Van Vlierberghe, P., De Weer, A., Muth, D., Westermann, F., Speleman, F., & Vandesompele, J. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r64 · Cited by 1,079
Zhou, B., Xiao, J. F., Tuli, L., & Ressom, H. W. (2011) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c1mb05350g · Cited by 639
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
Di Guida, R., Engel, J., Allwood, J. W., Weber, R. J. M., Jones, M. R., Sommer, U., Viant, M. R., & Dunn, W. B. (2016) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-016-1030-9 · Cited by 371
Gorrochategui, E., Jaumot, J., Lacorte, S., & Tauler, R. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.07.004 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Sysi-Aho, M., Katajamaa, M., Yetukuri, L., & Orešič, M.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-03-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-93
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039077785
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normalization method for metabolomics data using optimal selection of multiple internal standards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-8-93
- The paper
- Sysi-Aho, M., Katajamaa, M., Yetukuri, L., & Orešič, M. (2007). Normalization method for metabolomics data using optimal selection of multiple internal standards. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.