The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse
Open accessAbstract
Background: Similarities as well as differences in higher order chromatin arrangements of human cell types were previously reported. For an evolutionary comparison, we now studied the arrangements of chromosome territories and centromere regions in six mouse cell types (lymphocytes, embryonic stem cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, myoblasts and myotubes) with fluorescence in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Both species evolved pronounced differences in karyotypes after their last common ancestors lived about 87 million years ago and thus seem particularly suited to elucidate common and cell type specific themes of higher order chromatin arrangements in mammals. Results: All mouse cell types showed non-random correlations of radial chromosome territory positions with gene density as well as with chromosome size. The distribution of chromosome territories and pericentromeric heterochromatin changed during differentiation, leading to distinct cell type specific distribution patterns. We exclude a strict dependence of these differences on nuclear shape. Positional differences in mouse cell nuclei were less pronounced compared to human cell nuclei in agreement with smaller differences in chromosome size and gene density. Notably, the position of chromosome territories relative to each other was very variable. Conclusion: Chromosome territory arrangements according to chromosome size and gene density provide common, evolutionary conserved themes in both, human and mouse cell types. Our findings are incompatible with a previously reported model of parental genome separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping
Beagrie, R. A., Scialdone, A., Schueler, M., Kraemer, D. C. A., Chotalia, M., Xie, S. Q., Barbieri, M., de Santiago, I., Lavitas, L.-M., Branco, M. R., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21411 · Cited by 715
Chromosome territories – a functional nuclear landscape
Cremer, T., Cremer, M., Dietzel, S., Müller, S., Solovei, I., & Fakan, S. (2006) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.007 · Cited by 599
Self-citationSpatial Organization of the Mouse Genome and Its Role in Recurrent Chromosomal Translocations
Zhang, Y., McCord, R. P., Ho, Y.-J., Lajoie, B. R., Hildebrand, D. G., Simon, A. C., Becker, M. S., Alt, F. W., & Dekker, J. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.002 · Cited by 553
Heterochromatin: Guardian of the Genome
Janssen, A., Colmenares, S. U., & Karpen, G. H. (2018) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062653 · Cited by 500
Epigenetic patterns in a complete human genome
Gershman, A., Sauria, M. E. G., Guitart, X., Vollger, M. R., Hook, P. W., Hoyt, S. J., Jain, M., Shumate, A., Razaghi, R., Koren, S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj5089 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, R., Brero, A., von Hase, J., Schroeder, T., Cremer, T., & Dietzel, S.
- Venue
- BMC Cell Biology
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-44
- ISSN
- 1471-2121 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139594740
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2121-6-44
- The paper
- Mayer, R., Brero, A., von Hase, J., Schroeder, T., Cremer, T., & Dietzel, S. (2005). Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse. BMC Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2121-6-44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.