CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166RNA Research and SplicingDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A genome-wide in situhybridization map of RNA-binding proteins reveals anatomically restricted expression in the developing mouse brain

Open access
McKee, Adrienne E, Minet, Emmanuel, Stern, Charlene, Riahi, Shervin, Stiles, Charles D, Silver, Pamela A·2005·BMC Developmental Biology
DOI 10.1186/1471-213x-5-14PMC PMC1199591
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: In eukaryotic cells, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) contribute to gene expression by regulating the form, abundance, and stability of both coding and non-coding RNA. In the vertebrate brain, RBPs account for many distinctive features of RNA processing such as activity-dependent transcript localization and localized protein synthesis. Several RBPs with activities that are important for the proper function of adult brain have been identified, but how many RBPs exist and where these genes are expressed in the developing brain is uncharacterized. Results: Here we describe a comprehensive catalogue of the unique RBPs encoded in the mouse genome and provide an online database of RBP expression in developing brain. We identified 380 putative RBPs in the mouse genome. Using in situ hybridization, we visualized the expression of 323 of these RBP genes in the brains of developing mice at embryonic day 13.5, when critical fate choice decisions are made and at P0, when major structural components of the adult brain are apparent. We demonstrate i) that 16 of the 323 RBPs examined show neural-specific expression at the stages we examined, and ii) that a far larger subset (221) shows regionally restricted expression in the brain. Of the regionally restricted RBPs, we describe one group that is preferentially expressed in the E13.5 ventricular areas and a second group that shows spatially restricted expression in post-mitotic regions of the embryonic brain. Additionally, we find a subset of RBPs that share the same complex pattern of expression, in proliferating regions of the embryonic and postnatal NS and peripheral tissues. Conclusion: Our data show that, in contrast to their proposed ubiquitous involvement in gene regulation, most RBPs are not uniformly expressed. Here we demonstrate the region-specific expression of RBPs in proliferating vs. post-mitotic brain regions as well as cell-type-specific RBP expression. We identify uncharacterized RBPs that exhibit neural-specific expression as well as novel RBPs that show expression in non-neural tissues. The data presented here and in an online database provide a visual filter for the functional analysis of individual RBPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-213x-5-14

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 RBP expression in proliferative zones of the E13.5 mouse forebrain. In situ hybridization patterns for four RBPs on sections through the forebrain of E13.5 mice. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. All images show the same magnification.
Figure 1 RBP expression in proliferative zones of the E13.5 mouse forebrain. In situ hybridization patterns for four RBPs on sections through the forebrain of E13.5 mice. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. All images show the same magnification.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 RBP expression in post-mitotic areas of the E13.5 mouse forebrain. In situ hybridization patterns for four RBPs on sections through the forebrain of E13.5 mice. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. bg, basal ganglia; hy, hypothalamus; nc, neocortex. All images show the same magnification.
Figure 2 RBP expression in post-mitotic areas of the E13.5 mouse forebrain. In situ hybridization patterns for four RBPs on sections through the forebrain of E13.5 mice. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. bg, basal ganglia; hy, hypothalamus; nc, neocortex. All images show the same magnification.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Diversity of RBP expression in major cellular subtypes of the P0 retina. In situ hybridization for four representative RBPs that exhibit laminar-specific expression in the P0 mouse retina. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. A, B) A2bp1, C, D) Pcbp3, E, F) Safb, G, H) Rbm15. Panels A, C, E, and G show the same magnification. Panels B, D, F, and H show the same magnification. gcl, granule cell layer; inl, inner nuclear layer, onbl; outer neuroblastic layer.
Figure 3 Diversity of RBP expression in major cellular subtypes of the P0 retina. In situ hybridization for four representative RBPs that exhibit laminar-specific expression in the P0 mouse retina. Labels indicate Locuslink gene names. A, B) A2bp1, C, D) Pcbp3, E, F) Safb, G, H) Rbm15. Panels A, C, E, and G show the same magnification. Panels B, D, F, and H show the same magnification. gcl, granule cell layer; inl, inner nuclear layer, onbl; outer neuroblastic layer.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Representative examples of RBP synexpression in E13.5 and P0 mouse tissues. snRNP E and Son are transcribed in the perventricular areas of the E13.5 brain (A, E), in the P0 subventricular area of the lateral ventricle (B, F), in the external granule layer of the P0 cerebellum (C, G), as well as in postnatal developing teeth (D, H).
Figure 4 Representative examples of RBP synexpression in E13.5 and P0 mouse tissues. snRNP E and Son are transcribed in the perventricular areas of the E13.5 brain (A, E), in the P0 subventricular area of the lateral ventricle (B, F), in the external granule layer of the P0 cerebellum (C, G), as well as in postnatal developing teeth (D, H).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 In situ hybridization profiling uncovers the non-neural, restricted expression of novel RBPs. Data from ISH performed on (A, C) coronal E13.5 and on (B, D, E) E15 sagittal sections are presented for RRM-encoding RBPS. A, B) The Riken gene 2210008M09 is transcribed in epithelia covering the facial skeleton. C-E) BC013481 is detected in the choroid plexus, in the intestinal lining, and in the lining of the placenta. Panels C-E show the same magnification.
Figure 5 In situ hybridization profiling uncovers the non-neural, restricted expression of novel RBPs. Data from ISH performed on (A, C) coronal E13.5 and on (B, D, E) E15 sagittal sections are presented for RRM-encoding RBPS. A, B) The Riken gene 2210008M09 is transcribed in epithelia covering the facial skeleton. C-E) BC013481 is detected in the choroid plexus, in the intestinal lining, and in the lining of the placenta. Panels C-E show the same magnification.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Related

Metadata

Authors
McKee, A. E., Minet, E., Stern, C., Riahi, S., Stiles, C. D., & Silver, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Namur (BE)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Silver, Pamela A
ORCID
Venue
BMC Developmental Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-07-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
1471-213X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-213x-5-14
PMC
PMC1199591
OpenAlex
W2140526178
Cited by
166
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Developmental Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • Dana Foundation
  • Belgian American Educational Foundation
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • National Cancer Institute (T32-CA 09361, T32CA009361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
RNA-binding proteins, mouse brain development, embryonic brain, postnatal brain, regional gene expression, neural stem cells, cell type-specific gene expression, transcript localization
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Embryo, Mammalian, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Tissue Distribution, RNA-Binding Proteins, Genome, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review