The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dissecting the role of low-complexity regions in the evolution of vertebrate proteins
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low-complexity regions (LCRs) in proteins are tracts that are highly enriched in one or a few amino acids. Given their high abundance, and their capacity to expand in relatively short periods of time through replication slippage, they can greatly contribute to increase protein sequence space and generate novel protein functions. However, little is known about the global impact of LCRs on protein evolution. RESULTS: We have traced back the evolutionary history of 2,802 LCRs from a large set of homologous protein families from H.sapiens, M.musculus, G.gallus, D.rerio and C.intestinalis. Transcriptional factors and other regulatory functions are overrepresented in proteins containing LCRs. We have found that the gain of novel LCRs is frequently associated with repeat expansion whereas the loss of LCRs is more often due to accumulation of amino acid substitutions as opposed to deletions. This dichotomy results in net protein sequence gain over time. We have detected a significant increase in the rate of accumulation of novel LCRs in the ancestral Amniota and mammalian branches, and a reduction in the chicken branch. Alanine and/or glycine-rich LCRs are overrepresented in recently emerged LCR sets from all branches, suggesting that their expansion is better tolerated than for other LCR types. LCRs enriched in positively charged amino acids show the contrary pattern, indicating an important effect of purifying selection in their maintenance. CONCLUSION: We have performed the first large-scale study on the evolutionary dynamics of LCRs in protein families. The study has shown that the composition of an LCR is an important determinant of its evolutionary pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With their highly mutable nature, the presence of variable TRs in coding sequences may directly lead to an increase in protein variation and modification, which is particularly relevant for functional and evolutionary studies (25,26).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
T-coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment 1 1Edited by J. Thornton
Notredame, C., Higgins, D. G., & Heringa, J. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · Cited by 6,977
Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution.
Levinson, G., & Gutman, G. A. (1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040442 · Cited by 2,251
EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates
Vilella, A. J., Severin, J., Ureta-Vidal, A., Heng, L., Durbin, R., & Birney, E. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.073585.107 · Cited by 1,238
Microsatellites Within Genes: Structure, Function, and Evolution
Li, Y.-C. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh073 · Cited by 1,131
Diseases of Unstable Repeat Expansion: Mechanisms and Common Principles
Gatchel, J. R., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1691 · Cited by 794
[33] Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases
Wootton, J. C., & Federhen, S. (1996) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66035-2 · Cited by 758
Transcriptional Activation Modulated by Homopolymeric Glutamine and Proline Stretches
Gerber, H., Seipel, K., Georgiev, O., Höfferer, M., Hug, M., Rusconi, S., & Schaffner, W. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8303297 · Cited by 618
Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite loci
Chakraborty, R., Kimmel, M., Stivers, D. N., Davison, L. J., & Deka, R. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.3.1041 · Cited by 443
Shepard, P. J., & Hertel, K. J. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-242 · Cited by 416
Cited by
The code and beyond: transcription regulation by the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain
Harlen, K. M., & Churchman, L. S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.10 · Cited by 499
Tørresen, O. K., Star, B., Mier, P., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., Bateman, A., Jarnot, P., Gruca, A., Grynberg, M., Kajava, A. V., Promponas, V. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz841 · Cited by 347
Disentangling the complexity of low complexity proteins
Mier, P., Paladin, L., Tamana, S., Petrosian, S., Hajdu-Soltész, B., Urbanek, A., Gruca, A., Plewczynski, D., Grynberg, M., Bernadó, P., et al. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz007 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Radó-Trilla, N., & Albà, M.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155
- ISSN
- 1471-2148
- PMC
- PMC3523016
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 54
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.