The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Subtribe Artemisiinae of Tribe Anthemideae (Asteraceae) is composed of 18 largely Asian genera that include the sagebrushes and mugworts. The subtribe includes the large cosmopolitan, wind-pollinated genus Artemisia, as well as several smaller genera and Seriphidium, that altogether comprise the Artemisia-group. Circumscription and taxonomic boundaries of Artemisia and the placements of these small segregate genera is currently unresolved. RESULTS: We constructed a molecular phylogeny for the subtribe using the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA analyzed with parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian criteria. The resulting tree is comprised of three major clades that correspond to the radiate genera (e.g., Arctanthemum and Dendranthema), and two clades of Artemisia species. All three clades have allied and segregate genera embedded within each. CONCLUSIONS: The data support a broad concept of Artemisia s.l. that includes Neopallasia, Crossostephium, Filifolium, Seriphidium, and Sphaeromeria. However, the phylogeny excludes Elachanthemum, Kaschgaria, and Stilnolepis from the Artemisia-group. Additionally, the monophyly of the four subgenera of Artemisia is also not supported, with the exception of subg. Dracunculus. Homogamous, discoid capitula appear to have arisen in parallel four to seven times, with the loss of ray florets. Thus capitular morphology is not a reliable taxonomic character, which traditionally has been one of the defining characters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Rannala, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.227 · Cited by 781
Sy, L.-K., & Brown, G. D. (2001) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00358-2 · Cited by 36
Cited by
The Genus Artemisia: A Comprehensive Review
Bora, K. S., & Sharma, A. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Biology · doi:10.3109/13880209.2010.497815 · Cited by 548
Chaudhary, V., Kapoor, R., & Bhatnagar, A. K. (2008) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.04.003 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, L. E., Bates, P. L., Evans, T. M., Unwin, M. M., & Estes, J. R.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2002-09-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1898265056
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2148-2-17
- The paper
- Watson, L. E., Bates, P. L., Evans, T. M., Unwin, M. M., & Estes, J. R. (2002). Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera. BMC Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-2-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.