The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pigs in sequence space: A 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Background: Comparative whole genome analysis of Mammalia can benefit from the addition of more species. The pig is an obvious choice due to its economic and medical importance as well as its evolutionary position in the artiodactyls. Results: We have generated ~3.84 million shotgun sequences (0.66X coverage) from the pig genome. The data are hereby released (NCBI Trace repository with center name "SDJVP", and project name "Sino-Danish Pig Genome Project") together with an initial evolutionary analysis. The non-repetitive fraction of the sequences was aligned to the UCSC human-mouse alignment and the resulting three-species alignments were annotated using the human genome annotation. Ultra-conserved elements and miRNAs were identified. The results show that for each of these types of orthologous data, pig is much closer to human than mouse is. Purifying selection has been more efficient in pig compared to human, but not as efficient as in mouse, and pig seems to have an isochore structure most similar to the structure in human. Conclusion: The addition of the pig to the set of species sequenced at low coverage adds to the understanding of selective pressures that have acted on the human genome by bisecting the evolutionary branch between human and mouse with the mouse branch being approximately 3 times as long as the human branch. Additionally, the joint alignment of the shot-gun sequences to the human-mouse alignment offers the investigator a rapid way to defining specific regions for analysis and resequencing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome
Bejerano, G., Pheasant, M., Makunin, I., Stephen, S., Kent, W. J., Mattick, J. S., & Haussler, D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098119 · Cited by 1,732
DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment.
Morgenstern, B. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.3.211 · Cited by 678
Cited by
Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing
Pareek, C. S., Smoczynski, R., & Tretyn, A. (2011) · Journal of Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s13353-011-0057-x · Cited by 868
The pig as an animal model for human pathologies: A proteomics perspective
Bassols, A., Costa, C., Eckersall, P. D., Osada, J., Sabrià, J., & Tibau, J. (2014) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201300099 · Cited by 254
Schomberg, D. T., Tellez, A., Meudt, J. J., Brady, D. A., Dillon, K. N., Arowolo, F. K., Wicks, J., Rousselle, S. D., & Shanmuganayagam, D. (2016) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623315618292 · Cited by 97
A genetically modified minipig model for Alzheimer’s disease with SORL1 haploinsufficiency
Andersen, O. M., Bøgh, N., Landau, A. M., Pløen, G. G., Jensen, A. M. G., Monti, G., Ulhøi, B. P., Nyengaard, J. R., Jacobsen, K. R., Jørgensen, M. M., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100740 · Cited by 48
Self-citationPhylogenetic reconstruction based on synteny block and gene adjacencies
Drillon, G., Champeimont, R., Oteri, F., Fischer, G., & Carbone, A. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa114 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Wernersson, R., Schierup, M. H., Jørgensen, F. G., Gorodkin, J., Panitz, F., Stærfeldt, H.-H., Christensen, O. F., Mailund, T., Hornshøj, H., Klein, A., Wang, J., Liu, B., Hu, S., Dong, W., Li, W., Wong, G. K., Yu, J., Wang, J., Bendixen, C., Fredholm, M., Brunak, S., Yang, H., & Bolund, L.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2005-05-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-70
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1604336286
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pigs in sequence space: A 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-6-70
- The paper
- Wernersson, R., Schierup, M. H., Jørgensen, F. G., Gorodkin, J., Panitz, F., Stærfeldt, H.-H., Christensen, O. F., Mailund, T., Hornshøj, H., Klein, A., Wang, J., Liu, B., Hu, S., Dong, W., Li, W., Wong, G. K., Yu, J., Wang, J., Bendixen, C., . . . Bolund, L. (2005). Pigs in sequence space: A 0.66X coverage pig genome survey based on shotgun sequencing. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-70
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.