The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential expression of selected histone modifier genes in human solid cancers
Open accessAbstract
Background: Post-translational modification of histones resulting in chromatin remodelling plays a key role in the regulation of gene expression. Here we report characteristic patterns of expression of 12 members of 3 classes of chromatin modifier genes in 6 different cancer types: histone acetyltransferases (HATs)-EP300, CREBBP, and PCAF; histone deacetylases (HDACs)-HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC7A, and SIRT1; and histone methyltransferases (HMTs)-SUV39H1 and SUV39H2. Expression of each gene in 225 samples (135 primary tumours, 47 cancer cell lines, and 43 normal tissues) was analysedby QRT-PCR, normalized with 8 housekeeping genes, and given as a ratio by comparison with a universal reference RNA. Results: This involved a total of 13,000 PCR assays allowing for rigorous analysis by fitting a linear regression model to the data. Mutation analysis of HDAC1, HDAC2, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2 revealed only two out of 181 cancer samples (both cell lines) with significant coding-sequence alterations. Supervised analysis and Independent Component Analysis showed that expression of many of these genes was able to discriminate tumour samples from their normal counterparts. Clustering based on the normalized expression ratios of the 12 genes also showed that most samples were grouped according to tissue type. Using a linear discriminant classifier and internal cross-validation revealed that with as few as 5 of the 12 genes,SIRT1, CREBBP, HDAC7A, HDAC5 and PCAF, most samples were correctly assigned. Conclusion: The expression patterns of HATs, HDACs, and HMTs suggest these genes are important in neoplastic transformation and have characteristic patterns of expression depending on tissue of origin, with implications for potential clinical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · Cited by 34,610
Vandesompele, J., De Preter, K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Van Roy, N., De Paepe, A., & Speleman, F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · Cited by 20,038
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling
Alizadeh, A. A., Eisen, M. B., Davis, R. E., Ma, C., Lossos, I. S., Rosenwald, A., Boldrick, J. C., Sabet, H., Tran, T., Yu, X., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35000501 · Cited by 9,925
Jenuwein, T., & Allis, C. D. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063127 · Cited by 9,756
Independent Component Analysis
(2004) · Independent Component Analysis · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3717.003.0014 · Cited by 7,903
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., Hart, A. A. M., Voskuil, D. W., Schreiber, G. J., Peterse, J. L., Roberts, C., Marton, M. J., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021967 · Cited by 6,488
Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis
Hyvarinen, A. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.761722 · Cited by 6,246
Cited by
New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment
West, A. C., & Johnstone, R. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci69738 · Cited by 1,404
Targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer therapy: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials
Cheng, Y., He, C., Wang, M., Ma, X., Mo, F., Yang, S., Han, J., & Wei, X. (2019) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-019-0095-0 · Cited by 1,097
HDAC family: What are the cancer relevant targets?
Witt, O., Deubzer, H. E., Milde, T., & Oehme, I. (2009) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2008.08.016 · Cited by 1,069
The world of protein acetylation
Drazic, A., Myklebust, L. M., Ree, R., & Arnesen, T. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.06.007 · Cited by 804
Epigenetics and aging: the targets and the marks
Fraga, M. F., & Esteller, M. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.008 · Cited by 690
Metadata
- Authors
- Özdağ, H., Teschendorff, A. E., Ahmed, A. A., Hyland, S. J., Blenkiron, C., Bobrow, L., Veerakumarasivam, A., Burtt, G., Subkhankulova, T., Arends, M. J., Collins, V. P., Bowtell, D., Kouzarides, T., Brenton, J. D., & Caldas, C.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2006-04-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-90
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1687968277
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential expression of selected histone modifier genes in human solid cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-7-90
- The paper
- Özdağ, H., Teschendorff, A. E., Ahmed, A. A., Hyland, S. J., Blenkiron, C., Bobrow, L., Veerakumarasivam, A., Burtt, G., Subkhankulova, T., Arends, M. J., Collins, V. P., Bowtell, D., Kouzarides, T., Brenton, J. D., & Caldas, C. (2006). Differential expression of selected histone modifier genes in human solid cancers. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-90
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.