The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A direct repeat of E-box-like elements is required for cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of clock genes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The circadian expression of the mammalian clock genes is based on transcriptional feedback loops. Two basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) PAS (for Period-Arnt-Sim) domain-containing transcriptional activators, CLOCK and BMAL1, are known to regulate gene expression by interacting with a promoter element termed the E-box (CACGTG). The non-canonical E-boxes or E-box-like sequences have also been reported to be necessary for circadian oscillation. RESULTS: We report a new cis-element required for cell-autonomous circadian transcription of clock genes. This new element consists of a canonical E-box or a non-canonical E-box and an E-box-like sequence in tandem with the latter with a short interval, 6 base pairs, between them. We demonstrate that both E-box or E-box-like sequences are needed to generate cell-autonomous oscillation. We also verify that the spacing nucleotides with constant length between these 2 E-elements are crucial for robust oscillation. Furthermore, by in silico analysis we conclude that several clock and clock-controlled genes possess a direct repeat of the E-box-like elements in their promoter region. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel possible mechanism regulated by double E-box-like elements, not to a single E-box, for circadian transcriptional oscillation. The direct repeat of the E-box-like elements identified in this study is the minimal required element for the generation of cell-autonomous transcriptional oscillation of clock and clock-controlled genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Differential Response of Two Putative Mammalian Circadian Regulators, mper1and mper2, to Light
Albrecht, U., Sun, Z. S., Eichele, G., & Lee, C. C. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80495-x · Cited by 879
Rhythmic histone acetylation underlies transcription in the mammalian circadian clock
Etchegaray, J.-P., Lee, C., Wade, P. A., & Reppert, S. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01314 · Cited by 679
The circadian clock: pacemaker and tumour suppressor
Fu, L., & Lee, C. C. (2003) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1072 · Cited by 678
Transcriptional oscillation of canonical clock genes in mouse peripheral tissues
Yamamoto, T., Nakahata, Y., Soma, H., Akashi, M., Mamine, T., & Takumi, T. (2004) · BMC Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2199-5-18 · Cited by 308
Self-citationZheng (1999) · doi:10.1038/22659 · Cited by 293
Cited by
Rey, G., Cesbron, F., Rougemont, J., Reinke, H., Brunner, M., & Naef, F. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000595 · Cited by 474
Circadian Control of Global Gene Expression Patterns
Doherty, C. J., & Kay, S. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163432 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakahata, Y., Yoshida, M., Takano, A., Soma, H., Yamamoto, T., Yasuda, A., Nakatsu, T., & Takumi, T.
- Venue
- BMC Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2008-01-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1471-2199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006623829
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A direct repeat of E-box-like elements is required for cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of clock genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2199-9-1
- The paper
- Nakahata, Y., Yoshida, M., Takano, A., Soma, H., Yamamoto, T., Yasuda, A., Nakatsu, T., & Takumi, T. (2008). A direct repeat of E-box-like elements is required for cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of clock genes. BMC Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-9-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.