The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glycoprotein composition along the pistil of Malus x domestica and the modulation of pollen tube growth
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The characteristics of pollen tube growth are not constant, but display distinct patterns of growth within the different tissues of the pistil. In the stigma, the growth rate is slow and autotrophic, whereas in the style, it is rapid and heterotrophic. Very little is known about the interactions between these distinct maternal tissues and the traversing pollen tube and the role of this interaction on the observed metabolism. In this work we characterise pollen tube growth in the apple flower and look for differences in glycoprotein epitope localization between two different maternal tissues, the stigma and the style. RESULTS: While immunocytochemically-detected arabinogalactan proteins were present at high levels in the stigma, they were not detected in the transmitting tissue of the style, where extensins were abundant. Whereas extensins remained at high levels in unpollinated pistils, they were no longer present in the style following pollen tube passage. Similarily, while abundant in unpollinated styles, insoluble polysaccharides such as β-glucans, were depleted in pollinated pistils. CONCLUSIONS: The switch from autotropic to heterotrophic pollen tube growth correlates spatially with a change of glycoprotein epitopes between the stigma and the style. The depletion of extensins and polysaccharides following pollen tube passage in the style suggest a possible contribution to the acceleration of heterotrophic pollen tube growth, which would imply an active contribution of female tissues on prezygotic male-female crosstalk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiplex genome-editing technologies for revolutionizing plant biology and crop improvement
Abdelrahman, M., Wei, Z., Rohila, J. S., & Zhao, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.721203 · Cited by 125
Benevenuto, R. F., Agapito-Tenfen, S. Z., Vilperte, V., Wikmark, O.-G., van Rensburg, P. J., & Nodari, R. O. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173069 · Cited by 72
González, M. N., Massa, G. A., Andersson, M., Décima Oneto, C. A., Turesson, H., Storani, L., Olsson, N., Fält, A.-S., Hofvander, P., & Feingold, S. E. (2021) · Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) · doi:10.1007/s11240-020-02008-9 · Cited by 44
Interactions between Bt crops and aquatic ecosystems: A review
Venter, H. J., & Bøhn, T. (2016) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.3583 · Cited by 41
Abdel-Kareem, M. M., Zohri, A.-N. A., & Nasr, S. A. E. E. (2021) · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection · doi:10.1007/s41348-021-00461-y · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Losada, J. M., & Herrero, M.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100196739
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glycoprotein composition along the pistil of Malus x domestica and the modulation of pollen tube growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-14-1
- The paper
- Losada, J. M., & Herrero, M. (2014). Glycoprotein composition along the pistil of Malus x domestica and the modulation of pollen tube growth. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.