The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Focus group studies are increasingly published in health related journals, but we know little about how researchers use this method, particularly how they determine the number of focus groups to conduct. The methodological literature commonly advises researchers to follow principles of data saturation, although practical advise on how to do this is lacking. Our objectives were firstly, to describe the current status of sample size in focus group studies reported in health journals. Secondly, to assess whether and how researchers explain the number of focus groups they carry out. METHODS: We searched PubMed for studies that had used focus groups and that had been published in open access journals during 2008, and extracted data on the number of focus groups and on any explanation authors gave for this number. We also did a qualitative assessment of the papers with regard to how number of groups was explained and discussed. RESULTS: We identified 220 papers published in 117 journals. In these papers insufficient reporting of sample sizes was common. The number of focus groups conducted varied greatly (mean 8.4, median 5, range 1 to 96). Thirty seven (17%) studies attempted to explain the number of groups. Six studies referred to rules of thumb in the literature, three stated that they were unable to organize more groups for practical reasons, while 28 studies stated that they had reached a point of saturation. Among those stating that they had reached a point of saturation, several appeared not to have followed principles from grounded theory where data collection and analysis is an iterative process until saturation is reached. Studies with high numbers of focus groups did not offer explanations for number of groups. Too much data as a study weakness was not an issue discussed in any of the reviewed papers. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings we suggest that journals adopt more stringent requirements for focus group method reporting. The often poor and inconsistent reporting seen in these studies may also reflect the lack of clear, evidence-based guidance about deciding on sample size. More empirical research is needed to develop focus group methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More participants may be recruited in additional focus groups and/or interviews until saturation is met in line with established recommendations for focus group thematic analysis.72”
From Novel ACT-based eHealth psychoeducational intervention for students with mental distress: A study protocol for a mixed-methodology pilot trial (2019) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,637
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,296
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,625
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
McQuarrie, E. F., & Krueger, R. A. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172912 · Cited by 15,489
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1330 · Cited by 10,178
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939 · cited 5×
“As mentioned, definitions of focus group interviews usually refer to researcher-initiated gathering of a small group of people with the aim of facilitating discussion about a given topic [1,4-6].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSample size in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1995) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211 · Cited by 4,372 · cited 2×
“Thus, Sandelowski, in her discussion of sample size in qualitative research, emphasizes that both too few and too many groups can lower the quality of focus group studies [20].”
Background(1990) · Cited by 3,957
Corfman, K. P., & Lynch, J. G. (1983) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,944
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781848607941 · Cited by 2,798
Morgan, D. L. (1996) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129 · Cited by 2,353
Morgan, D. (1998) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483328164 · Cited by 1,803
Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art
Morgan, D. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483349008 · Cited by 1,586
Bowling, A. (1998) · Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1027//0269-8803.14.2.126 · Cited by 1,443
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A. J., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781848608337 · Cited by 1,231
Coimbra, C. Ε. A. (1992) · Cadernos de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0102-311x1992000400016 · Cited by 1,204
Stewart, D. C., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412991841 · Cited by 1,101 · cited 1×
“Stewart et al. (2007) observed that rarely are more than 3-4 focus groups conducted in the social sciences.”
BackgroundPowell, R. A., & Single, H. M. (1996) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499 · Cited by 707
Grounded Theory in Ethnography
Charmaz, K. C., & Mitchell, R. G. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781848608337.n11 · Cited by 671 · cited 1×
“It has been claimed by critics within the field of qualitative methodology that the concept of saturation is often misused in research reports [23,26].”
BackgroundMorse, J. M. (2007) · The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n11 · Cited by 570
Fern, E. F. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378201900101 · Cited by 557 · cited 2×
“Here, it is interesting to note that Fern’s experimental study indicated that more information is obtained by conducting two groups of four participants then one group of eight participants [19].”
BackgroundFocus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research
Webb, C., & Kevern, J. (2001) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01720.x · Cited by 493
Making sense of grounded theory in medical education
Kennedy, T. J. T., & Lingard, L. (2006) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02378.x · Cited by 469 · cited 1×
“recruiting, interviewing and analysis, is conducted as an iterative process for each interview, thus representing quite a different approach from the traditional quantitative design of successively calculating sample size beforehand and analysing all data collected [23,24].”
MethodUsing focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research
Hughes, D. L., & Dumont, K. A. (1993) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00942247 · Cited by 454 · cited 2×
“There is an extensive literature, ranging from academic classics in grounded theory to pragmatic “how to do” books, that teaches novices how focus groups are usually conducted and indicates how to organise focus groups and how to analyse the data, often within a restricted budget and time span [2,4-6,12-17].”
BackgroundHalcomb, E., Gholizadeh, L., DiGiacomo, M. L., Phillips, J. L., & Davidson, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x · Cited by 454 · cited 2×
“groups to evaluate health services, to elicit the views of key stakeholders or decision makers or to explore the views of marginalised groups that typically would not respond to a postal survey or would be intimidated by a conventional interview situation [2,5,7,8].”
BackgroundFern, E. F. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151525 · Cited by 222
The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis.
Bender, D., & Ewbank, D. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 215
Hendry, C. (2003) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.10.2.81.s11 · Cited by 211
Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: Toward a culturally anchored methodology
Hughes, D. L., Seidman, E., & Williams, N. J. (1993) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00942243 · Cited by 195
Wild, K. V., Boise, L., Lundell, J., & Foucek, A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/0733464807311435 · Cited by 193 · cited 2×
“Typical for these cases were situations where focus group studies were carried out alongside clinical intervention studies and where the authors had invited all participants from the intervention study to participate in the focus group interviews [34,36].”
BackgroundGoldstein, N. E., Mehta, D., Siddiqui, S. A., Teitelbaum, E. N., Zeidman, J. A., Singson, M., Pe, E., Bradley, E. H., & Morrison, R. S. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0239-8 · Cited by 172 · cited 1×
“One common example was that, despite their reference to point of saturation, their number of focus groups was pre-determined, as the extraction below shows (See also [44,45]):”
MethodCabassa, L. J., Hansen, M. C., Palinkas, L. A., & Ell, K. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.054 · Cited by 165 · cited 1×
“In addition, it was sometimes difficult for us to find focus group and participant numbers as this information was sometimes reported in different sections of the papers (See for example [28,29].”
BackgroundFatigue in osteoarthritis: a qualitative study
Power, J. D., Badley, E. M., French, M., Wall, A., & HAWKER, G. A. (2008) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-63 · Cited by 158 · cited 2×
“] conducted until we felt “saturation” (no new themes identified) was reached [41].”
BackgroundQuality Control in Focus Group Research
Krueger, R. A. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483349008.n5 · Cited by 144 · cited 1×
“In 1993, one of the “founding fathers” of focus group research methodology, Richard Krueger, complained that the field is burdened with “poor design and shoddy reporting” [11].”
BackgroundAdolescents perception of reproductive health care services in Sri Lanka
Agampodi, S. B., Agampodi, T. C., & Piyaseeli, U. K. D. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-98 · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“This should, in theory, imply that the number of focus groups was, in fact, appropriate. (See for example [ 38-43 ]).”
Rosen, T., Lachs, M. S., Bharucha, A. J., Stevens, S. M., Teresi, J. A., Nebres, F., & Pillemer, K. A. (2008) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01808.x · Cited by 113 · cited 1×
“By conducting a large number of focus groups with a significant cross-section of the facility’s employees, we reduced the possibility that results would be dramatically affected by a single focus group or methodological choice during coding [37].”
BackgroundNeergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Jensen, A. B., & Søndergaard, J. (2008) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/1472-684x-7-1 · Cited by 102
Content validity in the PROMIS social-health domain: a qualitative analysis of focus-group data
Castel, L. D., Williams, K. A., Bosworth, H. B., Eisen, S. V., Hahn, E. A., Irwin, D. E., Kelly, M. A. R., Morse, J., Stover, A. M., DeWalt, D. A., et al. (2008) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9352-3 · Cited by 97 · cited 1×
“We felt that two groups at each site would limit bias that might be seen in a single group or site and allow us to examine themes common across groups [54].”
BackgroundAsylum seekers' expectations of and trust in general practice: a qualitative study
O’Donnell, C. A., Higgins, M., Chauhan, R., & Mullen, K. (2008) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp08x376104 · Cited by 97
Open Access Citation Advantage: An Annotated Bibliography
Wagner, B. (2010) · Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship · Cited by 93
The role of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Germany – A focus group study of GPs
Joos, S., Musselmann, B., Miksch, A., Rosemann, T. J., & Szécsényi, J. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-127 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“sampling, and where, in addition all data seemed to have been gathered before the analysis (See for example [41,42,47-49]).”
Securing recruitment and obtaining informed consent in minority ethnic groups in the UK
Lloyd, C. E., Johnson, M., Mughal, S., Sturt, J. A., Collins, P. G. S., Roy, T., Bibi, R., & Barnett, A. H. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-68 · Cited by 73
Group interviews in primary care research: advancing the state of the art or ritualized research?
Twohig, P. L. (2002) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/19.3.278 · Cited by 69
Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Development of Framework and Intervention
Winickoff, J. P., Park, E. R., Walters, B. H., Berkowitz, A. B., Vieira, C., Friebely, J., Healey, E. A., & Rigotti, N. A. (2008) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-0478 · Cited by 68
Griffin, S. F., Wilson, D. K., Wilcox, S., Buck, J., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2007) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839906296011 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“It was a small community, and it was determined that after three focus groups, there would be a saturation point regarding their barriers and suggested solutions [46].”
BackgroundMohler, M. J., Coons, S. J., Hornbrook, M. C., Herrinton, L. J., Wendel, C. S., GRANT, M. M., & Krouse, R. S. (2008) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990802118360 · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“One common example was that, despite their reference to point of saturation, their number of focus groups was pre-determined, as the extraction below shows (See also [44, 45 ]):”
MethodHealing in Primary Care: A Vision Shared by Patients, Physicians, Nurses, and Clinical Staff
Hsu, C., Phillips, W. R., Sherman, K. J., Hawkes, R. J., & Cherkin, D. C. (2008) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.838 · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“sampling, and where, in addition all data seemed to have been gathered before the analysis (See for example [41,42,47-49]).”
MethodDyas, J., Apekey, T. A., Tilling, M., & Siriwardena, A. N. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-65 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“Despite this apparent sharp increase in focus group studies in health sciences journals since the 1980 s, there is surprisingly little knowledge about how this method is used and why [1,9,10].”
BackgroundFactors Affecting Physicians’ Responses to Patients’ Requests for Antidepressants: Focus Group Study
Tentler, A., Silberman, J., Paterniti, D. A., Kravitz, R. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0441-8 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“Often, authors explained the number of participants rather than the number of focus groups [34,35].”
BackgroundPediatric Obesity Attitudes, Services, and Information Among Rural Parents: A Qualitative Study
Davis, A. M., James, R. L., Curtis, M. R., Felts, S. M., & Daley, C. M. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.312 · Cited by 41 · cited 2×
“Two of the explanations appeared to be tied to difficulties in recruiting participants to additional groups [56,57], while one mentioned limited resources (“budgetary and staffing constraints”) which led the researchers to decide pre-study to conduct five focus groups [38].”
BackgroundFern, E. F. (1983) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 39
Hatchette, J. E., McGrath, P. J., Murray, M., & Finley, G. A. (2008) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2431-8-2 · Cited by 38 · cited 1×
“This should, in theory, imply that the number of focus groups was, in fact, appropriate. (See for example [ 38-43 ]).”
BackgroundCommunity and Family Perspectives on Addressing Overweight in Urban, African-American Youth
Burnet, D. L., Plaut, A. J., Ossowski, K., Ahmad, A., Quinn, M. T., Radovick, S., Gorawara‐Bhat, R., & Chin, M. H. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0469-9 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“This should, in theory, imply that the number of focus groups was, in fact, appropriate. (See for example [ 38-43 ]).”
Shuval, K., Weissblueth, E., Amira, A., Brezis, M., Faridi, Z., Ali, A., & Katz, D. L. (2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 35
Professional centred shared decision making: Patient decision aids in practicein primary care
Watson, D. B., Thomson, R. G., & Murtagh, M. J. (2008) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-5 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“Two of the explanations appeared to be tied to difficulties in recruiting participants to additional groups [56,57], while one mentioned limited resources (“budgetary and staffing constraints”) which led the researchers to decide pre-study to conduct five focus groups [38].”
BackgroundPérez, F., Aung, K. D., Ndoro, T., Engelsmann, B., & Dabis, F. (2008) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-401 · Cited by 35
Gutteling, J. J., de Man, R. A., Busschbach, J. J. V., & Darlington, A. (2008) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/1471-230x-8-25 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“For good results, just a few focus groups are sufficient, as data become saturated and little new information emerges after the first few groups [Morgan 96] [55].”
BackgroundBarimani, M., & Hylander, I. (2008) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.254 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“For example Barimani et al [51] explained their use of grounded theory and described how a constant comparison between empirical findings and theory had guided their sampling procedure until theoretical saturation was met.”
BackgroundNicolaidis, C., Gregg, J., Galian, H., McFarland, B., Curry, M., & Gerrity, M. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0606-0 · Cited by 29 · cited 1×
“[50]”
Nilsson, C., Skär, L., & Söderberg, S. (2008) · The Open Nursing Journal · doi:10.2174/1874434600802010068 · Cited by 26 · cited 2×
“Two of the explanations appeared to be tied to difficulties in recruiting participants to additional groups [56,57], while one mentioned limited resources (“budgetary and staffing constraints”) which led the researchers to decide pre-study to conduct five focus groups [38].”
BackgroundBlixen, C. E., Webster, N. J., Hund, A. J., Perzynski, A. T., Kanuch, S. W., Stoller, E. P., McCormick, R. A., & Dawson, N. V. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0483-y · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“[ 53 ]). As the example below illustrates, authors reported that the field lacks consistent guidelines.”
BackgroundKothari, A. R., Driedger, S. M., Bickford, J., Morrison, J. B., Sawada, M., Graham, I. D., & Crighton, E. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-4 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“For mixed method studies, it was sometimes difficult to separate between sample size information for different data collection methods (See for example [30]).”
MethodThe patient's experience of being a human subject
Kerrison, S., Laws, S., Cane, M., & Thompson, A. J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1258/jrsm.2007.070288 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“Typical for these cases were situations where focus group studies were carried out alongside clinical intervention studies and where the authors had invited all participants from the intervention study to participate in the focus group interviews [34,36].”
BackgroundStrategies for controlling blood pressure among low-income populations in Georgia.
Constantine, R., Brownstein, J. N., Hoover, S., Wordlaw-Stinson, L., Orenstein, D., Jones, P., & Farris, R. P. (2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703
“Reviews indicate that qualitative researchers demonstrate a low level of transparency regarding sample sizes and the underlying arguments for these (Carlsen & Glenton, 2011; Mason, 2010).”
BackgroundResultSample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 · Cited by 6,311
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846 · Cited by 4,776
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732316665344 · Cited by 4,597
“Furthermore, using an appropriate sample size is also an ethical issue (Carlsen & Glenton, 2011; Francis et al., 2010): qualitative samples that are larger than needed waste research funds, burden the study population, and lead to unused data, while samples that are too small may not fully capture…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7 · Cited by 3,115
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C.
- Affiliations
- SINTEF (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Carlsen, Benedicte
- ORCID
- Glenton, Claire
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2011-03-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-26
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3061958
- OpenAlex
- W2013335946
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 80.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Medical Research Methodology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Universitetet i Bergen
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- focus groups, sample size reporting, data saturation, grounded theory, qualitative research methodology, reporting guidelines, health journals, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Focus Groups, Sample Size, PubMed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
