The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is increasingly used as a key source of evidence synthesis to inform clinical practice. The theory and statistical foundations of meta-analysis continually evolve, providing solutions to many new and challenging problems. In practice, most meta-analyses are performed in general statistical packages or dedicated meta-analysis programs. RESULTS: Herein, we introduce Meta-Analyst, a novel, powerful, intuitive, and free meta-analysis program for the meta-analysis of a variety of problems. Meta-Analyst is implemented in C# atop of the Microsoft .NET framework, and features a graphical user interface. The software performs several meta-analysis and meta-regression models for binary and continuous outcomes, as well as analyses for diagnostic and prognostic test studies in the frequentist and Bayesian frameworks. Moreover, Meta-Analyst includes a flexible tool to edit and customize generated meta-analysis graphs (e.g., forest plots) and provides output in many formats (images, Adobe PDF, Microsoft Word-ready RTF). The software architecture employed allows for rapid changes to be made to either the Graphical User Interface (GUI) or to the analytic modules.We verified the numerical precision of Meta-Analyst by comparing its output with that from standard meta-analysis routines in Stata over a large database of 11,803 meta-analyses of binary outcome data, and 6,881 meta-analyses of continuous outcome data from the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Results from analyses of diagnostic and prognostic test studies have been verified in a limited number of meta-analyses versus MetaDisc and MetaTest. Bayesian statistical analyses use the OpenBUGS calculation engine (and are thus as accurate as the standalone OpenBUGS software). CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a new program for conducting meta-analyses that combines the advantages of existing software for this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369
The case of the misleading funnel plot
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Olkin, I. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationCumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Self-citationThe appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.060410 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationBax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-50 · Cited by 514
Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis).
Mosteller, F., & Colditz, G. A. (1996) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.000245 · Cited by 228
A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies
Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., & Moons, K. G. (2007) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-40 · Cited by 210
Cited by
Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End
Wallace, B. C., Dahabreh, I. J., Trikalinos, T. A., Lau, J., Trow, P., & Schmid, C. H. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v049.i05 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citationLorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03300.x · Cited by 1,006
Galanis, P., Vraka, I., Fragkou, D., Bilali, A., & Kaitelidou, D. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14839 · Cited by 993
Yin, J., Jin, X., Shan, Z., Li, S., Huang, H., Li, P., Peng, X., Peng, Z., Yu, K., Bao, W., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.117.005947 · Cited by 721
Global Prevalence of Hypertension in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Song, P., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Zha, M., Zhu, Y., Rahimi, K., & Rudan, I. (2019) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3310 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, B. C., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-80
- ISSN
- 1471-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049032499
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2288-9-80
- The paper
- Wallace, B. C., Schmid, C. H., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2009). Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-80
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.