Cited by 41Interprofessional Education and CollaborationDiabetes Management and EducationHealthcare Systems and Technology

Roles and relationships between health professionals involved in insulin initiation for people with type 2 diabetes in the general practice setting: a qualitative study drawing on relational coordination theory

Open access
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne, Furler, John, Blackberry, Irene, Young, Doris, O’Neal, David, Patterson, Elizabeth·2014·BMC Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of care for people with type 2 diabetes occurs in general practice, however when insulin initiation is required it often does not occur in this setting or in a timely manner and this may have implications for the development of complications. Increased insulin initiation in general practice is an important goal given the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes and a relative shortage of specialists. Coordination between primary and secondary care, and between medical and nursing personnel, may be important in achieving this. Relational coordination theory identifies key concepts that underpin effective interprofessional work: communication which is problem solving, timely, accurate and frequent and relationships between professional roles which are characterized by shared goals, shared knowledge and mutual respect. This study explores roles and relationships between health professionals involved in insulin initiation in order to gain an understanding of factors which may impact on this task being carried out in the general practice setting. METHOD: 21 general practitioners, practice nurses, diabetes nurse educators and physicians were purposively sampled to participate in a semi-structured interview. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: There were four closely interlinked themes identified which impacted on how health professionals worked together to initiate people with type 2 diabetes on insulin: 1. Ambiguous roles; 2. Uncertain competency and capacity; 3. Varying relationships and communication; and 4. Developing trust and respect. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that insulin initiation is generally recognised as acceptable in general practice. The role of the DNE and practice nurse in this space and improved communication and relationships between health professionals across organisations and levels of care are factors which need to be addressed to support this clinical work. Relational coordination provides a useful framework for exploring these issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2296-15-20

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of diabetes care is compromised by time constraints and fragmented care.

    “The quality of care is also compromised by time constraints and fragmented care [4].”

    From Effect of virtual care in type 2 diabetes management – a systematic umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Results (Uncertain competency and capacity; page unavailable) identify inadequate time for practice nurses as a safety concern in insulin initiation. The Results (Varying relationships and communication; page unavailable) describe poor communication across providers, and the Conclusion says barriers to coordination may harm patients. These findings support the concern, but the paper focuses on insulin initiation in general practice rather than establishing that time constraints and fragmented care compromise diabetes care generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Britt H Miller GC Charles J Henderson J Bayram C Valenti L Harrison C Pan Y O’Halloran J Zhang C Fahridin S General practice activity in Australia 2010–11 2011 Sydney: Sydney University Press
  2. Gittell JH High Performance Healthcare 2009 New York: McGraw-Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., Furler, J., Blackberry, I., Young, D., O’Neal, D., & Patterson, E.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
Venue
BMC Family Practice
Published
2014-01-31
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963682061
Cited by
41
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
  • RACGP Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
insulin initiation, type 2 diabetes, general practice, relational coordination theory, interprofessional collaboration, practice nurses, diabetes nurse educators, general practitioners, professional roles, communication between health professionals, trust and respect, primary care
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Nursing, Patient Care Team, Professional Role, Qualitative Research, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review