Characteristics and prevalence of hardcore smokers attending UK general practitioners
Open accessAbstract
Background: Smoking remains a public health problem and although unsolicited GPs' advice against smoking causes between one and three percent of smokers to stop, a significant proportion of smokers are particularly resistant to the notion of stopping smoking. These resistant smokers have been called "hardcore smokers" and although 16% of smokers in the community are hardcore, little is known about hardcore smokers presenting to primary care physicians. Consequently, this study reports the characteristics and prevalence of hardcore smokers attending UK GPs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using data from two different research projects was conducted. Data for this analysis had been collected from surgery consultation sessions with 73 GPs in Leicestershire, England, (42 GPs from one project). Research assistants distributed pre-consultation questionnaires to 4147 adults attending GPs' surgery sessions. Questionnaires identified regular smokers, the proportion of hardcore smokers and their characteristics. Non-hardcore and hardcore smokers' ages, gender and nicotine addiction levels were compared. Results: 1170 regular smokers attended surgery sessions and, 16.1% (95% CI, 14.1 to 18.4) were hardcore smokers. Hardcore smokers had higher levels of nicotine addiction than others (p = 0.000), measured by the Heaviness of Smoking Index and were more likely to be male [50.5% hardcore versus 35.3% non-hardcore, (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.4 to 2.6)] but no age differences were observed between groups. Conclusion: A significant minority of the smokers who present in general practice are resistant to the notion of smoking cessation and these smokers are more heavily nicotine addicted than others. Although clinical guidelines suggest that GPs should regularly advise all smokers against smoking, it is probable that hardcore smokers do not respond positively to this and help to make up the 97%–99% of smokers who do not quit after being advised to stop smoking by GPs. General practitioners need to find approaches for raising the issue of smoking during consultations in ways that do not reinforce the negative opinions of hardcore smokers concerning smoking cessation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Others have argued that the smoking population itself may have changed and that remaining smokers are more nicotine dependent and find it harder to stop.
“Others have argued that the smoking population itself may have changed 84,85 and that remaining smokers are more nicotine dependent and find it harder to stop.”
From Evaluating Long-term Outcomes of NHS Stop Smoking Services (ELONS): a prospective cohort study (2015) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., Rickert, W. S., & Robinson, J. C. (1989) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update
West, R. (2000) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.55.12.987 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice.
Ashenden, R., Silagy, C., & Weller, D. (1997) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/14.2.160 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Emery, S., Gilpin, E. A., Ake, C. F., Farkas, A. J., & Pierce, J. P. (2000) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.90.3.387 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Jarvis, M. J., Wardle, J., Waller, J., & Owen, L. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1061 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Butler, C., Pill, R., & Stott, N. C. H. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7148.1878 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
‘Advise Yes, Dictate No’. Patients’ Views on Health Promotion in the Consultation
Stott, N. C. H., & Pill, R. (1990) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/7.2.125 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Augustson, E. M., & Marcus, S. E. (2004) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200410001727876 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Pilnick, A., & Coleman, T. J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00336-2 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationColeman, T. J., Wynn, A. T., Barrett, S., et al. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7310.435 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of video-recorded consultations with those in which patients' consent is withheld.
Coleman, T. J., & Manku-Scott, T. (1998) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationColeman, T. J. (1996) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.531 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth promotion priorities for general practice: constructing and using “indicative prevalences”
Charlton, B. G., Calvert, N., White, M. J., Rye, G., Conrad, W., & van Zwanenberg, T. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6935.1019 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Coleman, T. J., Williams, M., & Wilson, A. (1996) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.526 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating Long-term Outcomes of NHS Stop Smoking Services (ELONS): a prospective cohort study
Dobbie, F., Hiscock, R., Leonardi-Bee, J., Murray, S., Shahab, L., Aveyard, P., Coleman, T., McEwen, A., McRobbie, H., Purves, R., et al. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19950 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- MacIntosh, H., & Coleman, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Coleman, Tim
- ORCID
- Coleman, Tim
- Venue
- BMC Family Practice
- Published
- 2006-03-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-24
- ISSN
- 1471-2296 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1450291
- OpenAlex
- W1811864433
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- smoking cessation, nicotine dependence, general practitioners, primary care, smoking prevalence, Heaviness of Smoking Index, smoking cessation counseling, gender differences in smoking
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Counseling, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, State Medicine, Tobacco Use Disorder, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review