The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Several types of cognitive or combined cognitive-motor intervention types that might influence physical functions have been proposed in the past: training of dual-tasking abilities, and improving cognitive function through behavioral interventions or the use of computer games. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the literature regarding the use of cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions to improve physical functioning in older adults or people with neurological impairments that are similar to cognitive impairments seen in aging. The aim was to identify potentially promising methods that might be used in future intervention type studies for older adults. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for the Medline/Premedline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases. The search was focused on older adults over the age of 65. To increase the number of articles for review, we also included those discussing adult patients with neurological impairments due to trauma, as these cognitive impairments are similar to those seen in the aging population. The search was restricted to English, German and French language literature without any limitation of publication date or restriction by study design. Cognitive or cognitive-motor interventions were defined as dual-tasking, virtual reality exercise, cognitive exercise, or a combination of these. RESULTS: 28 articles met our inclusion criteria. Three articles used an isolated cognitive rehabilitation intervention, seven articles used a dual-task intervention and 19 applied a computerized intervention. There is evidence to suggest that cognitive or motor-cognitive methods positively affects physical functioning, such as postural control, walking abilities and general functions of the upper and lower extremities, respectively. The majority of the included studies resulted in improvements of the assessed functional outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence on the effectiveness of cognitive or motor-cognitive interventions to improve physical functioning in older adults or people with neurological impairments is limited. The heterogeneity of the studies published so far does not allow defining the training methodology with the greatest effectiveness. This review nevertheless provides important foundational information in order to encourage further development of novel cognitive or cognitive-motor interventions, preferably with a randomized control design. Future research that aims to examine the relation between improvements in cognitive skills and the translation to better performance on selected physical tasks should explicitly take the relation between the cognitive and physical skills into account.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 · Cited by 10,578
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
From presence to consciousness through virtual reality.
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1651 · Cited by 1,831
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults
Hardy, S. E., Perera, S., Roumani, Y. F., Chandler, J. M., & Studenski, S. A. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01413.x · Cited by 628 · cited 1×
“The latter has been reported as a global indicator of functional performance in older adults and is a good predictor of falls [78].”
BackgroundPhysical and Cognitive Activity and Exercise for Older Adults: A Review
Hogan, M. (2005) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/ptg9-xdvm-yeta-mkxa · Cited by 156
Cited by
Adherence to technology-based exercise programs in older adults: A systematic review
Valenzuela, T., Okubo, Y., Woodbury, A., Lord, S. R., & Delbaere, K. (2018) · Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1519/jpt.0000000000000095 · Cited by 349
Pompeu, J. E., Mendes, F. A. D. S., Silva, K. G. D., Lobo, A. M., Oliveira, T. D. P., Zomignani, A. P., & Piemonte, M. E. P. (2012) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2012.06.004 · Cited by 354
Vogan, A. A., Alnajjar, F., Gochoo, M., & Khalid, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2966819 · Cited by 63
Leveraging technology to personalize cognitive enhancement methods in aging
Ziegler, D. A., Anguera, J. A., Gallen, C. L., Hsu, W.-Y., Wais, P. E., & Gazzaley, A. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00237-5 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Pichierri, G., Wolf, P., Murer, K., & de Bruin, E. D.
- Venue
- BMC Geriatrics
- Published
- 2011-06-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-29
- ISSN
- 1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992681067
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2318-11-29
- The paper
- Pichierri, G., Wolf, P., Murer, K., & de Bruin, E. D. (2011). Cognitive and cognitive-motor interventions affecting physical functioning: A systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.