Cited by 95Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Safety and tolerability of donepezil 23 mg in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Farlow, Martin, Veloso, Felix, Moline, Margaret, Yardley, Jane, Brand-Schieber, Elimor, Bibbiani, Francesco, Zou, Heng, Hsu, Timothy +1 more·2011·BMC Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Donepezil 23 mg/d, recently approved in the United States for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD), was developed to address the need for an additional treatment option for patients with advanced AD. This report, based on a pivotal phase 3 study, presents a detailed analysis of the safety and tolerability of increasing donepezil to 23 mg/d compared with continuing 10 mg/d. METHOD: Safety analyses comprised examination of the incidence, severity, and timing of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and their relationship to treatment initiation; changes in weight, electrocardiogram, vital signs, and laboratory parameters; and the incidence of premature study discontinuation. The analysis population (n = 1434) included all randomized patients who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had a postbaseline safety assessment. To further examine the effect of transition from a lower to a higher donepezil dose, a pooled analysis of safety data from 2 phase 3 trials of donepezil 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d was also performed. RESULTS: The safety population comprised 1434 patients: donepezil 23 mg/d (n = 963); donepezil 10 mg/d (n = 471); completion rates were 71.1% and 84.7%, respectively. The most common AEs were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (donepezil 23 mg/d: 11.8%, 9.2%, 8.3%; donepezil 10 mg/d: 3.4%, 2.5%, 5.3%, respectively). AEs that contributed most to early discontinuations were vomiting (2.9% of patients in the 23 mg/d group and 0.4% in the 10 mg/d group), nausea (1.9% and 0.4%), diarrhea (1.7% and 0.4%), and dizziness (1.1% and 0.0%). The percentages of patients with AEs in the 23 mg/d group, as well as the timing, type, and severity of these AEs, were similar to those seen in previous donepezil trials with titration from 5 to 10 mg/d. Serious AEs were uncommon (23 mg/d, 8.3%; 10 mg/d, 9.6%). DISCUSSION: The 23 mg/d dose of donepezil was associated with typical cholinergic AEs, particularly gastrointestinal-related AEs, similar to those observed in studies with a dose increase from 5 to 10 mg/d. CONCLUSION: The good safety and predictable tolerability profile for donepezil 23 mg/d supports its favorable risk/benefit ratio in patients with moderate to severe AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2377-11-57

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cholinesterase inhibitors can contribute to nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss, and several studies have documented increased GI adverse events with these agents.

    “Cholinesterase inhibitors can contribute to nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss, and several studies have specifically documented increased GI adverse events with these agents (Darreh-Shori et al., 2010; Farlow et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farlow, M., Veloso, F., Moline, M., Yardley, J., Brand-Schieber, E., Bibbiani, F., Zou, H., Hsu, T., & Satlin, A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Eisai (United States) (US)
  • Eisai (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Farlow, Martin
Venue
BMC Neurology
Published
2011-05-25
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033774309
Cited by
95
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Eisai
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dose titration, safety, tolerability, adverse events, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, cholinesterase inhibitors, treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, electrocardiographic changes, vital signs, laboratory parameters, weight change
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Body Weight, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Humans, Indans, Male, Piperidines, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review