The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation
Open accessAbstract
An international expert consensus committee recently recommended a brief battery of tests for cognitive evaluation in multiple sclerosis. The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) battery includes tests of mental processing speed and memory. Recognizing that resources for validation will vary internationally, the committee identified validation priorities, to facilitate international acceptance of BICAMS. Practical matters pertaining to implementation across different languages and countries were discussed. Five steps to achieve optimal psychometric validation were proposed. In Step 1, test stimuli should be standardized for the target culture or language under consideration. In Step 2, examiner instructions must be standardized and translated, including all information from manuals necessary for administration and interpretation. In Step 3, samples of at least 65 healthy persons should be studied for normalization, matched to patients on demographics such as age, gender and education. The objective of Step 4 is test-retest reliability, which can be investigated in a small sample of MS and/or healthy volunteers over 1-3 weeks. Finally, in Step 5, criterion validity should be established by comparing MS and healthy controls. At this time, preliminary studies are underway in a number of countries as we move forward with this international assessment tool for cognition in MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,737
A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2400 · Cited by 6,120
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,180
A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary
Levin, H. S. (1993) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540050007005 · Cited by 4,766
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Fong, G. T., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287930 · Cited by 4,475
L’examen Clinique en Psychologie
Rubé, P. (1959) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1959.13.4.989 · Cited by 3,302
Psychological Assessment Resources
Abidin, R. R. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,140
Benton, A. L. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000245 · Cited by 2,307
Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction
Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.5.685 · Cited by 2,110
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n478 · Cited by 2,008
Cited by
Clinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Rocca, M. A., Amato, M. P., De Stefano, N., Enzinger, C., Geurts, J. J., Penner, I.-K., Rovira, A., Sumowski, J. F., Valsasina, P., & Filippi, M. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70250-9 · Cited by 557
Self-citationCurrent limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures
Howieson, D. (2019) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1552762 · Cited by 143
Simpson, R., Mair, F. S., & Mercer, S. W. (2017) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-017-0880-8 · Cited by 95
Hughes, A. J., Bhattarai, J. (., Paul, S., & Beier, M. (2019) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.055 · Cited by 43
Physical activity and cognitive function in adults with multiple sclerosis: an integrative review
Morrison, J. D., & Mayer, L. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1213900 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Benedict, R. H., Amato, M. P., Boringa, J., Brochet, B., Foley, F., Fredrikson, S., Hamalainen, P., Hartung, H., Krupp, L., Penner, I., Reder, A. T., & Langdon, D.
- Venue
- BMC Neurology
- Published
- 2012-07-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-55
- ISSN
- 1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108193054
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 61
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2377-12-55
- The paper
- Benedict, R. H., Amato, M. P., Boringa, J., Brochet, B., Foley, F., Fredrikson, S., Hamalainen, P., Hartung, H., Krupp, L., Penner, I., Reder, A. T., & Langdon, D. (2012). Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.