Cited by 193Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight stigma is pervasive in Western society and in healthcare settings, and has a negative impact on victims' psychological and physical health. In the context of an increasing focus on the management of overweight and obese women during and after pregnancy in research and clinical practice, the current studies aimed to examine the presence of weight stigma in maternity care. Addressing previous limitations in the weight stigma literature, this paper quantitatively explores the presence of weight stigma from both patient and care provider perspectives. METHODS: Study One investigated associations between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and experiences of maternity care from a state-wide, self-reported survey of 627 Australian women who gave birth in 2009. Study Two involved administration of an online survey to 248 Australian pre-service medical and maternity care providers, to investigate their perceptions of, and attitudes towards, providing care for pregnant patients of differing body sizes. Both studies used linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Women with a higher BMI were more likely to report negative experiences of care during pregnancy and after birth, compared to lower weight women. Pre-service maternity care providers perceived overweight and obese women as having poorer self-management behaviours, and reported less positive attitudes towards caring for overweight or obese pregnant women, than normal-weight pregnant women. Even care providers who reported few weight stigmatising attitudes responded less positively to overweight and obese pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results provide preliminary evidence that weight stigma is present in maternity care settings in Australia. They suggest a need for further research into the nature and consequences of weight stigma in maternity care, and for the inclusion of strategies to recognise and combat weight stigma in maternity care professionals' training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-13-19

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dunlevy S: Fat mothers putting babies' health at risk. Courier Mail. 2010, 11: 7-
  2. Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockey C, Brocklehurst P: Recorded delivery: a national survey of women’s experience of maternity care 2006. 2007, Oxford, UK: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mulherin, K., Miller, Y. D., Barlow, F. K., Diedrichs, P. C., & Thompson, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Mulherin, Kate
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2013-01-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
19-19
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165869962
Cited by
193
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
22.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • Queensland Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
weight stigma, obstetric care, overweight in pregnancy, obese pregnant women, body mass index, patient experience, maternity care providers, self-management behavior, health professions education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Obesity, Pregnancy, Prejudice, Professional-Patient Relations, Quality of Health Care, Self Care, Stereotyping, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Qualitative Research, Overweight, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review