The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Counting every stillbirth and neonatal death through mortality audit to improve quality of care for every pregnant woman and her baby
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: While there is widespread acknowledgment of the need for improved quality and quantity of information on births and deaths, there has been less movement towards systematically capturing and reviewing the causes and avoidable factors linked to deaths, in order to affect change. This is particularly true for stillbirths and neonatal deaths which can fall between different health care providers and departments. Maternal and perinatal mortality audit applies to two of the five objectives in the Every Newborn Action Plan but data on successful approaches to overcome bottlenecks to scaling up audit are lacking. METHODS: We reviewed the current evidence for facility-based perinatal mortality audit with a focus on low- and middle-income countries and assessed the status of mortality audit policy and implementation. Based on challenges identified in the literature, key challenges to completing the audit cycle and affecting change were identified across the WHO health system building blocks, along with solutions, in order to inform the process of scaling up this strategy with attention to quality. RESULTS: Maternal death surveillance and review is moving rapidly with many countries enacting and implementing policies and with accountability beyond the single facility conducting the audits. While 51 priority countries report having a policy on maternal death notification in 2014, only 17 countries have a policy for reporting and reviewing stillbirths and neonatal deaths. The existing evidence demonstrates the potential for audit to improve birth outcomes, only if the audit cycle is completed. The primary challenges within the health system building blocks are in the area of leadership and health information. Examples of successful implementation exist from high income countries and select low- and middle-income countries provide valuable learning, especially on the need for leadership for effective audit systems and on the development and the use of clear guidelines and protocols in order to ensure that the audit cycle is completed. CONCLUSIONS: Health workers have the power to change health care routines in daily practice, but this must be accompanied by concrete inputs at every level of the health system. The system requires data systems including consistent cause of death classification and use of best practice guidelines to monitor performance, as well as leaders to champion the process, especially to ensure a no-blame environment, and to access change agents at other levels to address larger, systemic challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


![Figure 3 Adoption of maternal and perinatal death notification in Countdown priority countries. Countries with perinatal mortality audit in policy or a national system for facility review of perinatal deaths in 2014: 17 (Angola, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Gabon, Gambia, Indonesia, Iraq*, Kenya, Liberia*, Mexico*, South Africa, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Zambia*, Zimbabwe). *refers to stillbirths only or early neonatal only; not both. Sources: [9,13,61,62] See additional file 1 for more details.](/paper-figures/a8aa9334c421473eae388f2cfc6866ca/counting-every-stillbirth-and-neonatal-death-through-mortality-audit-to-improve-figure-3.jpg)




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A culture of trust is nurtured by strong leadership and continuous re-assurance of a “blame-free culture” [24].”
From Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In low resource settings where the numbers of maternal and perinatal deaths are the highest, significant challenges have been identified in the MPDSR process, including the quality of mortality reviews and linkage to concrete actions [23, 24].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why?
Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., & Zupan, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71048-5 · Cited by 3,670
Self-citationThe burden of oral disease: challenges to improving oral health in the 21st century.
Petersen, P. E. (2005) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 3,575
Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context
Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 · Cited by 3,240 · cited 1×
“Without adequate facilitation and guidance, blame may be transferred to the first delay (decision to seek care) [51], and community-related factors rather than to avoidable factors within the realm of the health provider [48].”
BackgroundEvery Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival
Lawn, J. E., Blencowe, H., Oza, S., You, D., Lee, A. C., Waiswa, P., Lalli, M., Bhutta, Z., Barros, A. J., Christian, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60496-7 · Cited by 1,929 · cited 1×
“Each year, half of the world’s babies do not receive a birth certificate; most neonatal deaths and almost all stillbirths have no death certificate, let alone information on the causes and avoidable factors surrounding these deaths [4].”
BackgroundSelf-citationStillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count?
Lawn, J. E., Blencowe, H., Pattinson, R., Cousens, S., Kumar, R., Ibiebele, I., Gardosi, J., Day, L. T., & Stanton, C. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62187-3 · Cited by 785 · cited 1×
“Disparate classification systems between CRVS, routine systems, and audit forms may result in duplication and inefficient documentation [45].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBeyond the Numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer
Lewis, G. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg009 · Cited by 552
Self-citationImproving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care
(2013) · doi:10.1002/9781118525975 · Cited by 506
Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries.
Flenady, V., Middleton, P., Smith, G. C. S., Duke, W., Erwich, J., Khong, T., Neilson, J., Ezzati, M., Koopmans, L., Ellwood, D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60064-0 · Cited by 470
Self-citation‡ (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60559-0 · Cited by 347 · cited 1×
“Maternal deaths were notifiable by national policy in 51 of 71 (72%) high burden countries in 2014 [13], up from 22 of 55 countries (40%) in 2008 [14] (Figure 3) with more countries moving towards implementation in addition to policy (See Table S1, additional file 1).”
BackgroundNewborn survival in Uganda: a decade of change and future implications
Mbonye, A. K., Sentongo, M., Mukasa, G., Byaruhanga, R., Sentumbwe-Mugisa, O., Waiswa, P., Sengendo, H. N., Aliganyira, P., Nakakeeto, M., Lawn, J. E., et al. (2012) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czs045 · Cited by 241
Self-citationMoxon, S. G., Lawn, J. E., Dickson, K., Simen-Kapeu, A., Gupta, G., Deorari, A. K., Singhal, N., New, K., Kenner, C. A., Bhutani, V. K., et al. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s2-s7 · Cited by 209
Self-citationPiette, J., Lun, K., Moura, L., Fraser, H., Mechael, P., Powell, J., & Khoja, S. (2012) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.099069 · Cited by 188 · cited 3×
“Even in settings where an electronic health information system has been rolled out more widely, like the District Health Information System (DHIS) used in Malawi, Rwanda and South Africa, this may have a limited impact if data quality remains poor [36].”
BackgroundFrom evidence to action to deliver a healthy start for the next generation
Mason, E. M., McDougall, L., Lawn, J. E., Gupta, A., Claeson, M., Pillay, Y. G., Presern, C., Baye, M. L., Mann, G., Wijnroks, M., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60750-9 · Cited by 176 · cited 1×
“Maternal and perinatal mortality audit is covered under two of the five objectives in the Every Newborn Action Plan: to address quality of care at birth and to generate data for decision making and action [7].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPattinson, R., Kerber, K., Waiswa, P., Day, L. T., Mussell, F., Asiruddin, S., Blencowe, H., & Lawn, J. E. (2009) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.011 · Cited by 161 · cited 17×
“For perinatal mortality specifically, a 2009 systematic review of critical incident audit found no randomised trials, but a meta-analysis of before-and-after effects associated with the introduction of perinatal audits in middleand low-income countries demonstrated a 30% reduction in mortality [27].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationNair, M., Yoshida, S., Lambrechts, T., Boschi-Pinto, C., Bose, K., Mason, E. M., & Mathai, M. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004749 · Cited by 157 · cited 2×
“This lack of audit acceptance is especially pronounced when it is enforced by an external agency [20].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationBradshaw, D. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60564-4 · Cited by 147 · cited 14×
“Rhoda NR, Greenfield D, Muller M, Prinsloo R, Pattinson RC, Kauchali S, Kerber K: Experiences with perinatal death reviews in South Africa–the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme: scaling up from programme to province to country.”
BackgroundInfluentialDumont, A., Fournier, P., Abrahamowicz, M., Traoré, M., Haddad, S., & Fraser, W. D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60593-0 · Cited by 140
Dickson, K., Kinney, M. V., Moxon, S. G., Ashton, J., Zaka, N., Simen-Kapeu, A., Sharma, G., Kerber, K. J., Daelmans, B. M. E. G., Gülmezoglu, A. M., et al. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s2-s1 · Cited by 124
Self-citationNeonatal care in rural Karnataka: healthy and harmful practices, the potential for change
Kesterton, A. J., & Cleland, J. (2009) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-20 · Cited by 92
Haskew, J., Rø, G., Saito, K., Turner, K., Odhiambo, G., Wamae, A., Sharif, S. K., & Sugishita, T. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.005 · Cited by 80 · cited 1×
“cell phone-based audit [39], cloud-storage [49]) have been piloted but not scaled up in many low-income settings.”
BackgroundBéhague, D. P., Kanhonou, L., Filippi, V., Lègonou, S., & Ronsmans, C. (2008) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01070.x · Cited by 77
Strengthening health facilities for maternal and newborn care: experiences from rural eastern Uganda
Namazzi, G., Waiswa, P., Nakakeeto, M., Nakibuuka, V., Namutamba, S., Najjemba, M., Namusaabi, R., Tagoola, A., Nakate, M. G., Ajeani, J., et al. (2015) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v8.24271 · Cited by 73 · cited 1×
“However, other than the forms to record case information and record book to keep minuted meeting notes and action item, the patient charts and registers necessary to extract the data may not exist, or may not be adequately designed to capture key information, or, even if they do exist, charts may be missing due to poo…”
BackgroundKidanto, H. L., Mogren, I., van Roosmalen, J., Thomas, A. N., Massawe, S. N., Nyström, L., & Lindmark, G. (2009) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-45 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“Documented avoidable factors may be subjective and depend on the reviewer [46], while the lack of a centralised database for compiling audit results reduces the ability to track trends at all levels of the process.”
BackgroundBelizán, M., Bergh, A., Cilliers, C., Pattinson, R., Voce, A. S., & the Synergy Group (2011) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-243 · Cited by 63
Self-citationMaternal death surveillance and response
DANEL, I. A., Graham, W. J., & Boerma, T. (2011) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.11.097220 · Cited by 62
Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010–2012: a population-based cohort study
Eskes, M., Waelput, A. J. M., Erwich, J. J., BROUWERS, H. A. A., Ravelli, A. C. J., Achterberg, P. W., Merkus, H. M. W. M., & Bruinse, H. W. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005652 · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“Nationwide perinatal mortality audits in the Netherlands are the result of a joint effort by government and professional colleges to implement audit in all of the country’s 90 obstetric units [30,31].”
BackgroundSelf-citationPasha, O., McClure, E. M., Wright, L. L., Saleem, S., Goudar, S. S., Chomba, E., Patel, A., Esamai, F., Garcés, A., Althabe, F., et al. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-215 · Cited by 61
The cultural environment behind successful maternal death and morbidity reviews
Lewis, G. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12801 · Cited by 57 · cited 6×
“Given that few settings have these clinical guidelines formally in place, most perinatal audit processes do not apply formal standards but rather use a team of local experts to determine avoidable factors in each case and identify solutions [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationReviewing maternal deaths to make pregnancy safer
Lewis, G. (2008) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.10.007 · Cited by 57
Self-citationNewborn health research priorities beyond 2015
Yoshida, S., Rudan, I., Lawn, J. E., Wall, S. N., Souza, J. P., Martines, J., & Bahl, R. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60263-4 · Cited by 53
Self-citationArmstrong, C. E., Lange, I. L., Magoma, M., Ferla, C., Filippi, V., & Ronsmans, C. (2014) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.12353 · Cited by 52 · cited 8×
“Kidanto HL, Mogren I, van Roosmalen J, Thomas AN, Massawe SN, Nystrom L, Lindmark G: Introduction of a qualitative perinatal audit at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.”
BackgroundInfluentialBayley, O., Chapota, H., Kainja, E., Phiri, T., Gondwe, C., King, C., Nambiar, B., Mwansambo, C., Kazembe, P. N., Costello, A. M. D. L., et al. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007753 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Importantly, the process also resulted in concrete actions at the community and health centre and district hospital level, however the system did not capture information on perinatal deaths [50].”
BackgroundOwolabi, H., Ameh, C., Bar‐Zeev, S., Adaji, S., Kachale, F., & van den Broek, N. R. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12998 · Cited by 47 · cited 9×
“Bakker W, van den Akker T, Mwagomba B, Khukulu R, van Elteren M, van Roosmalen J: Health workers’ perceptions of obstetric critical incident audit in Thyolo District, Malawi.”
BackgroundInfluentialHealth workers’ perceptions of obstetric critical incident audit in Thyolo District, Malawi
Bakker, W., van den Akker, T., Mwagomba, B. M., Khukulu, R., van Elteren, M., & van Roosmalen, J. (2011) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02832.x · Cited by 40 · cited 2×
“One challenge identified in the area of health workforce is the tendency to hide behind busy schedules rather than plan and attend audit meetings [18,38].”
BackgroundDurfee, M., Parra, J. M., & Alexander, R. (2009) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2009.01.004 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“In the US, multiagency child death review involves coroners, law enforcement, courts, child protective services, as well as health care providers [54] and in England, each local authority has established a multi-disciplinary child death overview panel to review all deaths of children from birth to 18 years in their ar…”
BackgroundMaternal near‐miss audits to improve quality of care
Tunçalp, Ö., & Souza, J. P. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12868 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“Given that maternal mortality is an increasingly rare event, more facilities are turning to near-miss reviews to develop recommendations to improve care [12,26].”
BackgroundWhat is the evidence for the role of audits to improve the quality of obstetric care
Ronsmans, C. (2001) · LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) · Cited by 32
Perinatal death audits in a peri-urban hospital in Kampala, Uganda
Nakibuuka, V., Okong, P., Waiswa, P., & Byaruhanga, R. (2013) · African Health Sciences · doi:10.4314/ahs.v12i4.6 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“Primarily, in less-resourced settings the main challenge is that stationery is not available to complete audits [39,40].”
BackgroundRhoda, N. R., Greenfield, D., Muller, M., Prinsloo, R. G., Pattinson, R. C., Kauchali, S., & Kerber, K. J. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12997 · Cited by 30 · cited 14×
“Rhoda NR, Greenfield D, Muller M, Prinsloo R, Pattinson RC, Kauchali S, Kerber K: Experiences with perinatal death reviews in South Africa–the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme: scaling up from programme to province to country.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationQuality-of-care audits and perinatal mortality in South Africa
Allanson, E. R., & Pattinson, R. C. (2015) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.14.144683 · Cited by 29 · cited 14×
“Rhoda NR, Greenfield D, Muller M, Prinsloo R, Pattinson RC, Kauchali S, Kerber K: Experiences with perinatal death reviews in South Africa–the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme: scaling up from programme to province to country.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationStrengthening accountability to end preventable maternal deaths
Mathai, M., Dilip, T. R., Jawad, I., & Yoshida, S. (2015) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.012 · Cited by 28 · cited 2×
“Maternal deaths were notifiable by national policy in 51 of 71 (72%) high burden countries in 2014 [13], up from 22 of 55 countries (40%) in 2008 [14] (Figure 3) with more countries moving towards implementation in addition to policy (See Table S1, additional file 1).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerinatal Audit, a report produced for the European Association of Perinatal Medicine
Dunn, P. M., & LINDBERG, B. S. (1996) · Cited by 27
Offline: The third revolution in global health
Horton, R. C. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60769-8 · Cited by 25 · cited 1×
“It has been suggested that we are entering the third revolution in global public health from metrics and evaluation to accountability and now to improved quality of care [60].”
BackgroundSidebotham, P. D., Fox, J., Horwath, J., & Powell, C. (2011) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/ip.2010.027169 · Cited by 25
Uptake of the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand perinatal mortality audit guideline
Flenady, V., Mahomed, K., Ellwood, D. A., CHARLES, A. K., Teale, G. R., CHADHA, Y. C., Jeffery, H. E., Stacey, T., Ibiebele, I., ELDER, M., et al. (2010) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2009.01125.x · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“In Australia while perinatal mortality audit guidelines exist and cause of death review using a single system has been implemented, uptake of substandard care review as part of this process remains haphazard and not reported nationally [32,33].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe use and impact of national confidential enquiries in high-income countries
Angelow, A., & Black, N. A. (2011) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040477 · Cited by 21
Setting up facility‐based maternal death reviews in N igeria
Achem, F., & Agboghoroma, C. O. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12817 · Cited by 20
The development of perinatal audit: 20 years' experience
Bergsjø, P., Bakketeig, L. S., & Langhoff‐Roos, J. (2003) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00224.x · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“In Norway, multidisciplinary perinatal audit has been implemented since 1986 [29].”
BackgroundAchievements and lessons learnt from facility‐based maternal death reviews in C ameroon
Brouwere, V. D., Delvaux, T., & Leke, R. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12902 · Cited by 18 · cited 2×
“A number of highburden, low-income countries have recently undertaken facility-based maternal death review systems, including Nigeria [22], Malawi [23], Cameroon [24], in Mali and Senegal through the QUARITE trial [25], and in eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria…”
BackgroundTowards greater effectiveness of perinatal death audit in low‐ and middle‐income countries
Buchmann, E. (2014) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12904 · Cited by 15 · cited 3×
“Current systems have selection bias given that perinatal deaths are missed due to lost files or poor recording, and the fact that a large proportion of deaths happen outside the health facility, either at a birth at home, or after discharge [16].”
BackgroundEmerging lessons from the FIGO LOGIC initiative on maternal death and near‐miss reviews
Lewis, G. (2014) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.007 · Cited by 14 · cited 3×
“A number of highburden, low-income countries have recently undertaken facility-based maternal death review systems, including Nigeria [22], Malawi [23], Cameroon [24], in Mali and Senegal through the QUARITE trial [25], and in eight countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Nigeria…”
BackgroundSelf-citationNational perinatal audit, a feasible initiative for the Netherlands!? A validation study
van Diem, M. T., Reu, P. A. O. M. D., Eskes, M., BROUWERS, H. A. A., Holleboom, C. A. G., Slagter‐Roukema, T., & Merkus, H. M. W. M. (2010) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.500468 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“Nationwide perinatal mortality audits in the Netherlands are the result of a joint effort by government and professional colleges to implement audit in all of the country’s 90 obstetric units [30,31].”
BackgroundBrouwere, V. D., Lewis, G., Filippi, V., Delvaux, T., Beyeza‐Kashesya, J., Gebrehiwot, Y., Bique, C., & Taylor, D. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61076-4 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“While the collection of cases and preparing for meetings does reflect a significant input of time from the audit task team, the cost per meeting has been estimated to be around US$200 in two west African settings [37].”
BackgroundSelf-citationKnowledge Summary 27: Death reviews: maternal, perinatal and child
Theiss-Nyland, K., & Rechel, B. (2013) · LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) · doi:10.17037/pubs.01229910 · Cited by 5
CARMMA – The campaign for accelerated reduction of maternal mortality in Africa
Lubbe, W. (2013) · Journal of Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2013.08.002 · Cited by 5
Stillbirth in high-income countries (Reply)
Flenady, V., Smith, G. C. S., Ellwood, D. A., Erwich, J. J., Frøen, J. F., & Khong, T. Y. (2011) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1
Self-citationStillbirth in high-income countries – Authors' reply
Flenady, V., Smith, G., Ellwood, D., Erwich, J. J., Frøen, J. F., & Khong, T. Y. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61410-4
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- UNICEF, WHO: Fulfilling the health agenda for women and children: Countdown to 2015 for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival. 2014, Geneva: WHO
- WHO: Everybody's business -- strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes : WHO's framework for action. 2007, Geneva: World Health Organization
- Flenady V, King J, Charles A, Gardener G, Ellwood D, Day K, McCowan L, Kent A, Tudehope D, Richardson R, et al: PSANZ Clinical Practice Guideline for Perinatal Mortality. Version 2.2. 2009, Queensland: Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand
- PMNCH: A Global Review of the Key Interventions Related to Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH). 2011, Geneva, Switzerland: The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health
- Jagau A: ACT for Birth: Improving the Quality of Care in Uganda. 2012
- Woods DL: Saving Mothers and Babies: Assessing and reducing mortality rates in your hospital. 2011, Cape Town: Perinatal Education Programme
- Commission on Information and Accountability: Keeping promises, measuring results: Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030
Lawn, J. E., Blencowe, H., Waiswa, P., Amouzou, A., Mathers, C., Hogan, D., Flenady, V., Frøen, J. F., Qureshi, Z. U., Calderwood, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00837-5 · Cited by 1,778
Self-citationNarayan, A. J., Rivera, L. M., Bernstein, R. E., Harris, W. W., & Lieberman, A. F. (2017) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.022 · Cited by 622
Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030
de Bernis, L., Kinney, M. V., Stones, W. R., ten Hoope‐Bender, P., Vivio, D., Leisher, S. H., Bhutta, Z. A., Gülmezoglu, M., Mathai, M., Belizán, J. M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00954-x · Cited by 479
Self-citationCount every newborn; a measurement improvement roadmap for coverage data
Moxon, S. G., Ruysen, H., Kerber, K. J., Amouzou, A., Fournier, S., Grove, J. T., Moran, A. C., Vaz, L. M. E., Blencowe, H. K., Conroy, N., et al. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-15-s2-s8 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFlannery, C., McHugh, S., Anaba, A. E., Clifford, E., O’Riordan, M., Kenny, L. C., McAuliffe, F. M., Kearney, P. M., & Byrne, M. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1816-z · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerber, K. J., Mathai, M., Lewis, G., Flenady, V., Erwich, J. J. H., Segun, T., Aliganyira, P., Abdelmegeid, A., Allanson, E., Roos, N., Rhoda, N., Lawn, J. E., & Pattinson, R.
- Affiliations
- Save the Children (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- University College London (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Jhpiego (US)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Kerber, Kate J
- ORCID
- Venue
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Published
- 2015-09-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- S9-S9
- ISSN
- 1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4577789
- OpenAlex
- W1924529051
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- stillbirth, neonatal death, Every Newborn Action Plan, cause of death classification, health information systems, health system leadership, avoidable causes of death, quality of care, low- and middle-income countries, health policy implementation
- MeSH terms
- Africa, Asia, Developing Countries, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Leadership, Medical Audit, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Stillbirth, Perinatal Mortality, Quality Improvement, Healthcare Financing, Health Information Systems, Maternal Death, Perinatal Death
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review