Cited by 418Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Transition to parenthood: the needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood

Open access
Deave, Toity, Johnson, Debbie, Ingram, Jenny·2008·BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and the transition to parenthood are major adjustment periods within a family. Existing studies have asked parents, retrospectively, about their experience of antenatal education, mainly focusing on women. We sought to address this gap by asking first-time mothers and their partners about how they could be better supported during the antenatal period, particularly in relation to the transition to parenthood and parenting skills. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit 24 nulliparous women with a range of ages from two healthcare organisations in South-West England, 20 of whom had partners. Recruitment took place antenatally at around 28 weeks gestation. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken at home in the last trimester of pregnancy and between 3-4 months postpartum. Content analysis of the interview data was undertaken. RESULTS: Several common themes emerged from both the ante- and postnatal data, including support mechanisms, information and antenatal education, breastfeeding, practical baby-care and relationship changes. Knowledge about the transition to parenthood was poor. Women generally felt well supported, especially by female relatives and, for those who attended them, postnatal groups. This was in contrast to the men who often only had health professionals and work colleagues to turn to. The men felt very involved with their partners' pregnancy but excluded from antenatal appointments, antenatal classes and by the literature that was available. Parents had been unaware of, and surprised at, the changes in the relationship with their partners. They would have liked more information on elements of parenting and baby care, relationship changes and partners' perspectives prior to becoming parents. CONCLUSION: Many studies and policy documents have highlighted the paucity of parents' preparation for parenthood. This study has indicated the need for an improvement in parents' preparation for parenthood, the importance of including fathers in antenatal education and that inadequate preparation remains a concern to both women and their partners. This paper identifies several avenues for action and further research to improve both new parents' experience of antenatal education and their preparation for parenthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2393-8-30

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gottman JM Shapiro AF Parthemer J Bringing baby home: a workshop for new and expectant parents Int J Childbirth Education 2004 19 28 30
  2. McKellar LV Pincombe JI Henderson AM Insights from Australian parents into educational experiences in the early postnatal period Midwifery 2006 22 356 64 16690179 10.1016/j.midw.2005.09.004 · DOI
  3. NPEU Recorded delivery: a national survey of women's experience of maternity care 2007 Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deave, T., Johnson, D., & Ingram, J.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Deave, Toity
Venue
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2008-07-29
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
1471-2393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968539681
Cited by
418
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
transition to parenthood, prenatal education, primiparous women, postpartum support, breastfeeding, infant care, social support, nulliparous women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Breast Feeding, Child Rearing, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Parents, Pregnancy, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Parenting, Spouses, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review