Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SHOX2 DNA Methylation is a Biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer based on bronchial aspirates

Open access
Schmidt, Bernd, Liebenberg, Volker, Dietrich, Dimo, Schlegel, Thomas, Kneip, Christoph, Seegebarth, Anke, Flemming, Nadja, Seemann, Stefanie, Distler, Jürgen, Lewin, Jörn, Tetzner, Reimo, Weickmann, Sabine, Wille, Ulrike, Liloglou, Triantafillos, Raji, Olaide, Walshaw, Martin, Fleischhacker, Michael, Witt, Christian, Field, John K·2010·BMC Cancer

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to show that SHOX2 DNA methylation is a tumor marker in patients with suspected lung cancer by using bronchial fluid aspirated during bronchoscopy. Such a biomarker would be clinically valuable, especially when, following the first bronchoscopy, a final diagnosis cannot be established by histology or cytology. A test with a low false positive rate can reduce the need for further invasive and costly procedures and ensure early treatment. Methods: Marker discovery was carried out by differential methylation hybridization (DMH) and real-time PCR. The real-time PCR based HeavyMethyl technology was used for quantitative analysis of DNA methylation of SHOX2 using bronchial aspirates from two clinical centres in a case-control study. Fresh-frozen and Saccomanno-fixed samples were used to show the tumor marker performance in different sample types of clinical relevance. Results: Valid measurements were obtained from a total of 523 patient samples (242 controls, 281 cases). DNA methylation of SHOX2 allowed to distinguish between malignant and benign lung disease, i.e. abscesses, infections, obstructive lung diseases, sarcoidosis, scleroderma, stenoses, at high specificity (68% sensitivity [95% CI 62-73%], 95% specificity [95% CI 91-97%]). Conclusions: Hypermethylation of SHOX2 in bronchial aspirates appears to be a clinically useful tumor marker for identifying subjects with lung carcinoma, especially if histological and cytological findings after bronchoscopy are ambiguous.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2407-10-600

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, B., Liebenberg, V., Dietrich, D., Schlegel, T., Kneip, C., Seegebarth, A., Flemming, N., Seemann, S., Distler, J., Lewin, J., Tetzner, R., Weickmann, S., Wille, U., Liloglou, T., Raji, O., Walshaw, M., Fleischhacker, M., Witt, C., & Field, J. K.
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2010-11-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
600-600
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996628512
Cited by
201
References
0
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SHOX2 DNA Methylation is a Biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer based on bronchial aspirates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2407-10-600
The paper
Schmidt, B., Liebenberg, V., Dietrich, D., Schlegel, T., Kneip, C., Seegebarth, A., Flemming, N., Seemann, S., Distler, J., Lewin, J., Tetzner, R., Weickmann, S., Wille, U., Liloglou, T., Raji, O., Walshaw, M., Fleischhacker, M., Witt, C., & Field, J. K. (2010). SHOX2 DNA Methylation is a Biomarker for the diagnosis of lung cancer based on bronchial aspirates. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-600

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.