Cited by 72Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene copy number (GCN) correlates with clinical activity of irinotecan-cetuximab in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer: a fluorescence in situ (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) analysis

Open access
Scartozzi, Mario, Bearzi, Italo, Mandolesi, Alessandra, Pierantoni, Chiara, Loupakis, Fotios, Zaniboni, Alberto, Negri, Francesca, Quadri, Antonello +8 more·2009·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: K-RAS wild type colorectal tumors show an improved response rate to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Nevertheless 70% to 40% of these patients still does not seem to benefit from this therapeutic approach. FISH EGFR GCN has been previously demonstrated to correlate with clinical outcome of colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. CISH also seemed able to provide accurate EGFR GCN information with the advantage of a simpler and reproducible technique involving immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Based on these findings we investigated the correlation between both FISH and CISH EGFR GCN and clinical outcome in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-cetuximab. METHODS: Patients with advanced K-RAS wild-type, colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan-cetuximab after failure of irinotecan-based chemotherapy were eligible. A cut-off value for EGFR GCN of 2.6 and 2.12 for FISH and CISH respectively was derived from ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were available for analysis. We observed a partial remission in 9 (60%) and 2 (9%) cases with a FISH EGFR GCN >or= 2.6 and < 2.6 respectively (p = 0.002) and in 10 (36%) and 1 (6%) cases with a CISH EGFR GCN >or= 2.12 and < 2.12 respectively (p = 0.03). Median TTP was 7.7 and 6.4 months in patients showing increased FISH and CISH EGFR GCN whereas it was 2.9 and 3.1 months in those with low FISH and CISH EGFR GCN (p = 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSION: FISH and CISH EGFR GCN may both represent effective tools for a further patients selection in K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2407-9-303

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scartozzi, M., Bearzi, I., Mandolesi, A., Pierantoni, C., Loupakis, F., Zaniboni, A., Negri, F., Quadri, A., Zorzi, F., Galizia, E., Berardi, R., Biscotti, T., Labianca, R., Masi, G., Falcone, A., & Cascinu, S.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero (IT)
Corresponding author
Scartozzi, Mario
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2009-08-27
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
303-303
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001454653
Cited by
72
References
24
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
EGFR gene copy number, cetuximab, irinotecan, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromogenic in situ hybridization, predictive biomarkers, treatment response, time to progression, patient selection
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Irinotecan, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Treatment Failure, In Situ Hybridization, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Gene Dosage, ras Proteins, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review