Cited by 156Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

HER2 gene copy number status may influence clinical efficacy to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Open access
Martin, V, Landi, L, Molinari, F, Fountzilas, G, Geva, R, Riva, A, Saletti, P, De Dosso, S +6 more·2013·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS is the only validated biomarker used to select patients for administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapies. To identify additional predictive markers, we investigated the importance of HER2, the primary EGFR dimerisation partner, in this particular disease. METHODS: We evaluated the HER2 gene status by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in 170 KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab. RESULTS: Depending on HER2 gene copy number status, patients showed three distinct cytogenetic profiles: 4% of patients had HER2 gene amplification (R:HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2) in all neoplastic cells (HER2-all-A), 61% of patients had HER2 gain due to polysomy or to gene amplification in minor clones (HER2-FISH+*), and 35% of patients had no or slight HER2 gain (HER2-FISH-). These subgroups were significantly correlated with different clinical behaviours, in terms of response rate (RR; P=0.0006), progression-free survival (PFS; P<0.0001) and overall survival (OS; P<0.0001). Patients with HER2-all-A profile experienced the worst outcome, patients with HER2-FISH- profile showed an intermediate behaviour and patients with HER2-FISH+* profile were related to the highest survival probability (median PFS in months: 2.5 vs 3.9 vs 7.6, respectively; median OS in months: 4.2 vs 9.7 vs 13, respectively). CONCLUSION: HER2 gene copy number status may influence the clinical response to anti-EGFR-targeted therapy in mCRC patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2013.4

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with tumors featuring HER2 amplification or heregulin overexpression and treated with cetuximab or panitumumab experienced disease progression and shorter progression-free and overall survival compared with HER2 wild-type cases.

    “In retrospective studies, patients with tumors featuring HER2 amplification or heregulin overexpression and treated with cetuximab or panitumumab experienced disease progression and shorter progression-free and overall survival compared with HER2 wild-type cases [91-93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, V, Landi, L., Molinari, F., Fountzilas, G., Geva, R., Riva, A., Saletti, P., De Dosso, S., Spitale, A., Tejpar, S., Kalogeras, K. T., Mazzucchelli, L., Frattini, M., & Cappuzzo, F.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Cantonale di Patologia (CH)
  • Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
  • Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (CH)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Frattini, M
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2013-01-24
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
668-675
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2034338421
Cited by
156
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oncosuisse
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
HER2 gene copy number, metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, panitumumab, KRAS wild-type, predictive biomarkers, HER2 amplification, polysomy, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Panitumumab, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gene Amplification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Rate, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Gene Dosage, ras Proteins, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review