Cited by 436Medical Practices and RehabilitationMedical Coding and Health InformationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems

Open access
Kostanjsek, Nenad·2011·BMC Public Health

Abstract

A common framework for describing functional status information is needed in order to make this information comparable and of value. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which has been approved by all its member states, provides this common language and framework. The article provides an overview of ICF taxonomy, introduces the conceptual model which underpins ICF and elaborates on how ICF is used at population and clinical level. Furthermore, the article presents key features of the ICF tooling environment and outlines current and future developments of the classification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s4-s3

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 436

Metadata

Authors
Kostanjsek, N.
Affiliations
World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Kostanjsek, Nenad
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2011
Volume
11
Issue
Suppl 4
Pages
S3
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027013776
Cited by
434
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, disability statistics, health information systems, functional status, conceptual framework, disability classification
MeSH terms
Disability Evaluation, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Information Systems, Vocabulary, Controlled, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review