Cited by 796Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions

Open access
Al-harbi·2012·Patient Preference and Adherence

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with major depression respond to antidepressant treatment, but 10%-30% of them do not improve or show a partial response coupled with functional impairment, poor quality of life, suicide ideation and attempts, self-injurious behavior, and a high relapse rate. The aim of this paper is to review the therapeutic options for treating resistant major depressive disorder, as well as evaluating further therapeutic options. METHODS: In addition to Google Scholar and Quertle searches, a PubMed search using key words was conducted, and relevant articles published in English peer-reviewed journals (1990-2011) were retrieved. Only those papers that directly addressed treatment options for treatment-resistant depression were retained for extensive review. RESULTS: Treatment-resistant depression, a complex clinical problem caused by multiple risk factors, is targeted by integrated therapeutic strategies, which include optimization of medications, a combination of antidepressants, switching of antidepressants, and augmentation with non-antidepressants, psychosocial and cultural therapies, and somatic therapies including electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, deep brain stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and vagus nerve stimulation. As a corollary, more than a third of patients with treatment-resistant depression tend to achieve remission and the rest continue to suffer from residual symptoms. The latter group of patients needs further study to identify the most effective therapeutic modalities. Newer biomarker-based antidepressants and other drugs, together with non-drug strategies, are on the horizon to address further the multiple complex issues of treatment-resistant depression. CONCLUSION: Treatment-resistant depression continues to challenge mental health care providers, and further relevant research involving newer drugs is warranted to improve the quality of life of patients with the disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ppa.s29716

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 155 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depression 2000 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition Text Revision Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association 2000
  2. [37]Phillips KA Nierenberg AA The assessment and treatment of refractory depression J Clin Psychiatry 1994 55 20 26 8077165
  3. [82]Nemeroff CB Use of atypical antipsychotics in refractory depression and anxiety J Clin Psychiatry 2005 66 Suppl 8 13 21 16336032
  4. [110]Torres CV Lozano AM Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of therapy-refractory depression Rev Neurol 2008 47 477 482 18985598

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-harbi
Venue
Patient Preference and Adherence
Published
2012-05
Volume
6
Pages
369
ISSN
1177-889X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016292245
Cited by
796
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Preference and Adherence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, antidepressant augmentation, antidepressant switching, antidepressant combination therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, psychosocial interventions, relapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review