The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding critical health literacy: a concept analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Interest in and debates around health literacy have grown over the last two decades and key to the discussions has been the distinction made between basic functional health literacy, communicative/interactive health literacy and critical health literacy. Of these, critical health literacy is the least well developed and differing interpretations of its constituents and relevance exist. The aim of this study is to rigorously analyse the concept of critical health literacy in order to offer some clarity of definition upon which appropriate theory, well grounded practice and potential measurement tools can be based. METHOD: The study uses a theoretical and colloquial evolutionary concept analysis method to systematically identify the features associated with this concept. A unique characteristic of this method is that it practically combines an analysis of the literature with in depth interviews undertaken with practitioners and policy makers who have an interest in the field. The study also analyses how the concept is understood across the contexts of time, place, discipline and use by health professionals, policy makers and academics. RESULTS: Findings revealed a distinct set of characteristics of advanced personal skills, health knowledge, information skills, effective interaction between service providers and users, informed decision making and empowerment including political action as key features of critical health literacy. The potential consequences of critical health literacy identified are in improving health outcomes, creating more effective use of health services and reducing inequalities in health thus demonstrating the relevance of this concept to public health and health promotion. CONCLUSIONS: While critical health literacy is shown to be a unique concept, there remain significant contextual variations in understanding particularly between academics, practitioners and policy makers. Key attributes presented as part of this concept when it was first introduced in the literature, particularly those around empowerment, social and political action and the existence of the concept at both an individual and population level, have been lost in more recent representations. This has resulted in critical health literacy becoming restricted to a higher order cognitive individual skill rather than a driver for political and social change. The paper argues that in order to retain the uniqueness and usefulness of the concept in practice efforts should be made to avoid this dilution of meaning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 · Cited by 5,505
Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion
Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) · doi:10.17226/10883 · Cited by 3,444
Critical health literacy: A review and critical analysis
Chinn, D. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.004 · Cited by 471
Cited by
The Nuances of Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy
Velardo, S. (2015) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.04.328 · Cited by 376
Walters, R., Leslie, S. J., Polson, R., Cusack, T., & Gorely, T. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0 · Cited by 292
Rosário, R., Martins, M. R. O., Augusto, C., Silva, M. J., Martins, S., Duarte, A., Fronteira, I., Ramos, N., Okan, O., & Dadaczynski, K. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17238987 · Cited by 103
Langius-Eklöf, A., Crafoord, M.-T., Christiansen, M., Fjell, M., & Sundberg, K. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3450-y · Cited by 51
Guttersrud, Ø., & Petterson, K. S. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980014003152 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Sykes, S., Wills, J., Rowlands, G., & Popple, K.
- Venue
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2013-02-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-150
- ISSN
- 1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054430194
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.