Cited by 230Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesSchool Health and Nursing Education

A systematic review of the effectiveness of individual, community and societal level interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children

Open access
Hillier-Brown, Frances C, Bambra, Clare L, Cairns, Joanne-Marie, Kasim, Adetayo, Moore, Helen J, Summerbell, Carolyn D·2014·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tackling childhood obesity is one of the major contemporary public health policy challenges and vital in terms of addressing socioeconomic health inequalities.We aimed to systematically review studies of the effectiveness of interventions (individual, community and societal) operating via different approaches (targeted or universal) in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity-related outcomes amongst children. METHODS: Nine electronic databases were searched from start date to October 2012 along with website and grey literature searches. The review examined the best available international evidence from interventions that aimed to prevent obesity, treat obesity, or improve obesity-related behaviours (diet and/or physical activity) amongst children (aged 0-18 years) in any setting and country, so long as they provided relevant information and analysis on both socioeconomic status and obesity-related outcomes. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted using established mechanisms and narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS: We located 23 studies that provided the 'best available' (strongest methodologically) international evidence. At the individual level (n = 4), there was indicative evidence that screen time reduction and mentoring health promotion interventions could be effective in reducing inequalities in obesity. For the community level interventions (n = 17), evidence was inconclusive - with some studies suggesting that school-based health promotion activities and community-based group-based programmes were effective in reducing obesity - others not. Societal level evaluations were few (n = 1). However, there was no evidence to suggest that any of these intervention types increase inequalities and several studies found that interventions could at least prevent the widening of inequalities in obesity. The majority of studies were from America and were of 6-12 year old children. CONCLUSIONS: The review has found only limited evidence although some individual and community based interventions may be effective in reducing socio-economic inequalities in obesity-related outcomes amongst children but further research is required, particularly of more complex, societal level interventions and amongst adolescents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-14-834

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/834/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hillier-Brown, F. C., Bambra, C. L., Cairns, J.-M., Kasim, A., Moore, H. J., & Summerbell, C. D.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bambra, Clare L
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2014-08-11
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
834-834
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005443579
Cited by
230
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (09/3010/14)
  • Newcastle University
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K02325X/1)
  • Public Health Research Programme (09/3010/14)
  • Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
childhood obesity, socioeconomic disparities, health disparities, obesity prevention, obesity treatment, screen time reduction, school-based intervention, community-based programs, individual interventions, diet, physical activity, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Status Disparities, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review