Cited by 249Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesPublic Health Policies and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations?

White, Martin, Adams, Jean, Heywood, Peter·2009·Social inequality and public health

Abstract

The second major pathway through which social inequality affects public health is through the cumulative effects of advantage and disadvantage on broad population groups. This chapter presents a theoretical model for this, showing how in the presence of social inequalities, even interventions designed to improve health can widen health disparities between groups. For example, requiring cancer screening at medical examinations might be a laudable public health intervention, but in a society where not everyone is covered by health insurance, it tends to widen health disparities even as it improves overall health. The chapter also examines the inverse care law which states that ‘the availability of good medical care tends to vary inversely with the need for it in the population served’.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1332/policypress/9781847423207.003.0005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
White, M., Adams, J., & Heywood, P.
Venue
Social inequality and public health
Publisher
Policy Press
Published
2009-04-22
Pages
64-81
OpenAlex
W2482465208
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 4
FWCI
26.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Policy Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health disparities, public health interventions, health insurance coverage, cancer screening, inverse care law, social inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review