Cited by 41Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

Impact of social ties on self-reported health in France: Is everyone affected equally?

Open access
Heritage, Zoë, Wilkinson, Richard G, Grimaud, Olivier, Pickett, Kate E·2008·BMC Public Health

Abstract

AIM: To examine the association of social ties and income with self reported health, in order to investigate if social ties have a greater impact on the health of people on low incomes compared to those financially better off. METHODS: A nationally representative cross-sectional study of 5205 French adults using data from questionnaires which asked about health, income and relationships with family and friends etc. RESULTS: Less than good self-rated health (SRH) is twice as frequently reported by people in the lowest income group than those in the highest income group. People with low incomes are also more likely to have felt alone on the previous day, received no phone call during the last week, have no friends, not be a member of a club, and to live alone. Socially isolated people report lower SRH. Likelihood ratio tests for interaction vs. main effect models were statistically significant for 2 of the measures of social ties, borderline for 2 others and non-significant for one. For 4 of the 5 indicators of social ties, larger odd ratios show that social isolation is more strongly associated with less than good SRH among people on low incomes compared to those with a higher income. CONCLUSION: Social isolation is associated with 'less than good' self-rated health. This effect appears to be more important for people on a low income.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-8-243

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participation in social activities has been associated with better health among participants from low socio-economic groups.

    “For instance, participation in social activities has been associated with better health among participants from low socio-economic groups [42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heritage, Z., Wilkinson, R. G., Grimaud, O., & Pickett, K. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR)
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2008-07-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
243-243
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109723878
Cited by
41
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CSA/03/07/014)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
social ties, social isolation, self-rated health, income, low-income populations, health disparities, loneliness, social networks, living alone
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, France, Health Status, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Isolation, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review