Cited by 56Public Health Policies and EducationDisaster Response and ManagementCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Public perceptions of quarantine: community-based telephone survey following an infectious disease outbreak

Open access
Tracy, C Shawn, Rea, Elizabeth, Upshur, Ross EG·2009·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of restrictive measures such as quarantine draws into sharp relief the dynamic interplay between the individual rights of the citizen on the one hand and the collective rights of the community on the other. Concerns regarding infectious disease outbreaks (SARS, pandemic influenza) have intensified the need to understand public perceptions of quarantine and other social distancing measures. METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of the general population in the Greater Toronto Area in Ontario, Canada. Computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) technology was used. A final sample of 500 individuals was achieved through standard random-digit dialing. RESULTS: Our data indicate strong public support for the use of quarantine when required and for serious legal sanctions against those who fail to comply. This support is contingent both on the implementation of legal safeguards to protect against inappropriate use and on the provision of psychosocial supports for those affected. CONCLUSION: To engender strong public support for quarantine and other restrictive measures, government officials and public health policy-makers would do well to implement a comprehensive system of supports and safeguards, to educate and inform frontline public health workers, and to engage the public at large in an open dialogue on the ethical use of restrictive measures during infectious disease outbreaks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-9-470

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tracy, C. S., Rea, E., & Upshur, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Toronto Public Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Tracy, C Shawn
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2009-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
470-470
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071417501
Cited by
56
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Keywords
quarantine, public perception, infectious disease outbreaks, social distancing, legal protection, psychosocial support, individual and collective rights, SARS, pandemic influenza, citizen participation, Greater Toronto Area
MeSH terms
Catchment Area, Health, Data Collection, Disease Outbreaks, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Ontario, Public Opinion, Quarantine, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review