Cited by 394Risk Perception and ManagementPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The public’s response to severe acute respiratory syndrome in Toronto and the United States

Blendon, Robert J., Benson, John M., DesRoches, Catherine M., Raleigh, Elizabeth, Taylor‐Clark, Kalahn·2004·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Using data from 13 surveys of the public, this article compares the public's response to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Ontario (specifically, Toronto), the other Canadian provinces, and the United States, which had substantial differences in the number of SARS cases. Findings suggest that, even at a relatively low level of spread among the population, the SARS outbreak had a significant psychological and economic impact. They also suggest that the success of efforts to educate the public about the risk of SARS and appropriate precautions was mixed. Some of the community-wide problems with SARS might have been avoided with better communication by public health officials and clinicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/382355

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., DesRoches, C. M., Raleigh, E., & Taylor‐Clark, K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Blendon, Robert J.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-04
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
925-931
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2150483277
Cited by
393
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 101 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
44.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
SARS, public perception, psychological impact, economic impact, public health communication, risk communication, public education, precautionary behavior, SARS epidemic, Toronto, Ontario, United States
MeSH terms
Canada, Communication, Data Collection, Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Quarantine, United States, Infection Control, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review