Cited by 38Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Open access
Lange, Ansgar, Prenzler, Anne, Frank, Martin, Golpon, Heiko, Welte, Tobias, von der Schulenburg, J-Matthias·2014·BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) imposes a substantial burden on patients, health care systems and society due to increasing incidence and poor survival rates. In recent years, advances in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC have resulted from the introduction of targeted therapies. However, the application of these new agents increases treatment costs considerably. The objective of this article is to review the economic evidence of targeted therapies in metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility studies. Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and 9 other databases were searched from 2000 through April 2013 (including update) for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via the validated Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (including update) involving the MoAb bevacizumab and the Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib met all inclusion criteria. The majority of studies analyzed the CE of first-line maintenance and second-line treatment with erlotinib. Five studies dealt with bevacizumab in first-line regimes. Gefitinib and pharmacogenomic profiling were each covered by only two studies. Furthermore, the available evidence was of only fair quality. CONCLUSION: First-line maintenance treatment with erlotinib compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) can be considered cost-effective. In comparison to docetaxel, erlotinib is likely to be cost-effective in subsequent treatment regimens as well. The insights for bevacizumab are miscellaneous. There are findings that gefitinib is cost-effective in first- and second-line treatment, however, based on only two studies. The role of pharmacogenomic testing needs to be evaluated. Therefore, future research should improve the available evidence and consider pharmacogenomic profiling as specified by the European Medicines Agency. Upcoming agents like crizotinib and afatinib need to be analyzed as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2466-14-192

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In EGFRm+ NSCLC, EGFR TKIs have a clear benefit over platinum-based chemotherapy in terms of cost-effectiveness.

    “In EGFRm+ NSCLC, EGFR TKIs have a clear benefit over platinum-based chemotherapy in terms of cost-effectiveness.”

    From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Results section (page not provided) reports one study finding first-line erlotinib cost-effective versus carboplatin–gemcitabine in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, from a Chinese health-care perspective. The Discussion cautions that this study’s results have limited reliability, so it does not establish a clear benefit for EGFR TKIs generally over platinum-based chemotherapy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/14/192/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lange, A., Prenzler, A., Frank, M., Golpon, H., Welte, T., & von der Schulenburg, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Lange, Ansgar
Venue
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2014-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
192-192
ISSN
1471-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007734670
Cited by
38
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pulmonary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leibniz Universität Hannover (cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, targeted therapy, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility analysis, erlotinib, gefitinib, bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line maintenance therapy, docetaxel, best supportive care
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Quinazolines, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review