Cited by 349Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePharmaceutical Economics and Policy

How much is life worth: cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, and the $440 billion question

Open access
Fojo, T., Grady, C.·2009·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The spiraling cost of cancer care, in particular the cost of cancer therapeutics that achieve only marginal benefits, is under increasing scrutiny. Although health-care professionals avoid putting a value on a life, our limited resources require that society address what counts as a benefit, the extent to which cost should factor in deliberations, and who should be involved in these decisions. Professional societies, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology, government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, and insurance companies should be involved. However, no segment of society is better qualified to address these issues than the oncology community. Oncologists must offer clear guidance for the conduct of research, interpretation of results, and prescription of chemotherapies. We review recent drug approvals and clinical trials and comment on their relevance to the issue of the spiraling cost of oncology therapeutics. We suggest some standards that would serve as a starting point for addressing these issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djp177

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. ASCO Press Briefi ng Sunday , June 1, 9:00 AM (CDT). http://www.asco. org/ASCO/News/Press+Center/Annual+Meeting/News+Releases/Advan ces+in+Lung%2C+Testicular+Cancer .
  2. Saltz L , Rubin MS , Hochster HS , et al . Cetuximab (IMC-C225) plus iri- notecan (CPT-11) is active in CPT-11 refractory colorectal cancer that expresses epidermal growth factor receptor . Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol . 2001 ; 20 : 3a . Abstract 7 .
  3. N Engl J Med. 2007 ; 356 ( 2 ): 125 -134 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fojo, T., & Grady, C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2009-06-29
Volume
101
Issue
15
Pages
1044-1048
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2135630936
Cited by
349
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 47
FWCI
110.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, drug costs, value of life, cost-effectiveness, cancer therapeutics, drug approval, clinical trials, oncology prescribing, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Industry, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Public Opinion, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Survival Analysis, Drug Costs, Treatment Outcome, Drug Approval, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Disease-Free Survival, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Value of Life, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review