Cited by 111Bone fractures and treatmentsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

A multi-center, randomized, clinical study to compare the effect and safety of autologous cultured osteoblast(Ossron™) injection to treat fractures

Open access
Kim, Seok-Jung, Shin, Yong-Woon, Yang, Kyu-Hyun, Kim, Sang-Bum, Yoo, Moon-Jib, Han, Suk-Ku, Im, Soo-Ah, Won, Yoo-Dong +7 more·2009·BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed a multicenter, open, randomized, clinical study of autologous cultured osteoblast injection for long-bone fracture, to evaluate the fracture healing acceleration effect and the safety of autologous cultured osteoblasts. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with long-bone fractures were randomly divided into two groups, i.e. those who received autologous cultured osteoblast injection and those who received no treatment. The sum of the difference in the callus formation scores after four and eight weeks, was used as the first efficacy variable. RESULTS: The autologous cultured osteoblast injection group showed fracture healing acceleration of statistical significance, and there were no specific patient complications when using this treatment. CONCLUSION: Autologous cultured osteoblast injection should therefore be considered as a successful treatment option for treating long-bone fracture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2474-10-20

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have shown that both ASCs and BM-MSCs can promote bone tissue reconstruction in sites of bone loss with and without multifunctional biomaterials.

    “Multiple studies have shown that both ASCs and BM-MSCs can promote bone tissue reconstruction in sites of bone loss with and without multifunctional biomaterials (ceramic, biodegradable polymers, and composite materials) that have been designed to guide bone regeneration [39,90,91,92].”

    From Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: Immunomodulatory and Bone Regeneration Potential after Tumor Excision in Osteosarcoma Patients (2023) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Methods describe injecting bone-marrow-derived cultured osteoblasts mixed with fibrin into fracture sites, and the Discussion reports more rapid callus formation in the treated group (no page numbers supplied). This supports a related claim about cell-assisted bone healing, but the paper does not study ASCs or directly test BM-MSCs, nor does it evaluate the listed ceramic, polymer, or composite biomaterials. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S.-J., Shin, Y.-W., Yang, K.-H., Kim, S.-B., Yoo, M.-J., Han, S.-K., Im, S.-A., Won, Y.-D., Sung, Y.-B., Jeon, T.-S., Chang, C.-H., Jang, J.-D., Lee, S.-B., Kim, H.-C., & Lee, S.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Konyang University (KR)
  • Dankook University Hospital (KR)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Sewon Cellontech (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Sang-Bum
Venue
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2009-02-12
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1471-2474 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973452274
Cited by
111
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, long bone fractures, callus formation, cell therapy safety, cell injection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alkaline Phosphatase, Bone Marrow Cells, Bony Callus, Cells, Cultured, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoblasts, Transplantation, Autologous, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Cell Transplantation, Cell Culture Techniques, Collagen Type I, Fractures, Bone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review