The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of miRNA expression patterns using total RNA extracted from matched samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cells and snap frozen cells
Open accessAbstract
Background: Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have limited utility in applications involving analysis of gene expression due to mRNA degradation and modification during fixation and processing. This study analyzed 160 miRNAs in paired snap frozen and FFPE cells to investigate if miRNAs may be successfully detected in archival specimens. Results: Our results show that miRNA extracted from FFPE blocks was successfully amplified using Q-RT-PCR. The levels of expression of miRNA detected in total RNA extracted from FFPE were higher than that extracted from snap frozen cells when the quantity of total RNA was identical. This phenomenon is most likely explained by the fact that larger numbers of FFPE cells were required to generate equivalent quantities of total RNA than their snap frozen counterparts. Conclusion: We hypothesise that methylol cross-links between RNA and protein which occur during tissue processing inhibit the yield of total RNA. However, small RNA molecules appear to be less affected by this process and are recovered more easily in the extraction process. In general miRNAs demonstrated reliable expression levels in FFPE compared with snap frozen paired samples, suggesting these molecules might prove to be robust targets amenable to detection in archival material in the molecular pathology setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taganov, K. D., Boldin, M. P., Chang, K.-J., & Baltimore, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605298103 · Cited by 4,317
Cited by
Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection
Mitchell, P. S., Parkin, R. K., Kroh, E. M., Fritz, B. R., Wyman, S. K., Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E. L., Peterson, A., Noteboom, J., O'Briant, K. C., Allen, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804549105 · Cited by 7,969
MicroRNAs accurately identify cancer tissue origin
Rosenfeld, N., Aharonov, R., Meiri, E., Rosenwald, S., Spector, Y., Zepeniuk, M., Benjamin, H., Shabes, N., Tabak, S., Levy, A., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1392 · Cited by 812
Circulating microRNAs as Novel Minimally Invasive Biomarkers for Breast Cancer
Heneghan, H. M., Miller, N., Lowery, A. J., Sweeney, K. J., Newell, J., & Kerin, M. J. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cc939f · Cited by 687
Circulating MicroRNAs: a novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers
Zen, K., & Zhang, C. (2012) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.20215 · Cited by 502
Data Normalization Strategies for MicroRNA Quantification
Schwarzenbach, H., da Silva, A. M., Calin, G., & Pantel, K. (2015) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2015.239459 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Smyth, P., Flavin, R., Cahill, S., Denning, K., Aherne, S., Guenther, S. M., O'Leary, J. J., & Sheils, O.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2007-06-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-36
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996760332
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of miRNA expression patterns using total RNA extracted from matched samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cells and snap frozen cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-7-36
- The paper
- Li, J., Smyth, P., Flavin, R., Cahill, S., Denning, K., Aherne, S., Guenther, S. M., O'Leary, J. J., & Sheils, O. (2007). Comparison of miRNA expression patterns using total RNA extracted from matched samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cells and snap frozen cells. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-7-36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.