Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 502

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating MicroRNAs: a novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers

Zen, Ke, Zhang, Chen‐Yu·2012·Medicinal Research Reviews

Abstract

Specific and sensitive non‐invasive biomarkers for the detection of human epithelial malignancies are urgently required to reduce the worldwide morbidity and mortality caused by cancer. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 19–24 nt noncoding RNAs that are frequently dysregulated in cancer and have shown great promise as tissue‐based markers for cancer classification. Once thought to be unstable RNA molecules, miRNAs are now shown to be stably expressed in serum, plasma, urine, saliva, and other body fluids. Moreover, the unique expression patterns of these circulating miRNAs are correlated with certain human diseases, including various types of cancer. Therefore, tumor‐derived miRNAs in serum or plasma are emerging as novel blood‐based fingerprints for the detection of human cancers, especially at an early stage. This review presented newly uncovered cellular and molecular mechanisms of the sources and stability of circulating miRNAs, revealing their great potential as a class of highly specific and sensitive biomarkers for tumor classification and prognostication. Meanwhile, this review also addressed certain critical issues that hinder the wide application of this new approach. Some potential challenges for the transition of circulating miRNAs from a research setting to a clinical application were also highlighted, with a future perspective of the incorporation of circulating miRNAs in the field of clinical oncology, especially their great potential from diagnostic to prognostic and predictive applications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Med Res Rev

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/med.20215

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 118 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11 <2334::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-I · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11
  2. 10.2174/1874189400701010001 · doi:10.2174/1874189400701010001
  3. Schneider J, 2000, Comparison of the tumor markers tumor M2‐PK, CEA, CYFRA 21‐1, NSE and SCC in the diagnosis of lung cancer, Anticancer Res, 20, 5053
  4. Huber K, 1992, Determination of plasma urokinase‐type plasminogen activator antigen in patients with primary liver cancer: characterization as tumor‐associated antigen and comparison with alpha‐fetoprotein, Cancer Res, 52, 1717
  5. 10.1083/jcb.200807034 · doi:10.1083/jcb.200807034

Cited by

See all 502

Metadata

Authors
Zen, K., & Zhang, C.
Venue
Medicinal Research Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-09
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
326-348
ISSN
  • 0198-6325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1128
OpenAlex
W1519433744
Cited by
502
References
118
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (30225037, 30471991, 30570731, 30730080, 30772484)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB503909)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating MicroRNAs: a novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/med.20215
The paper
Zen, K., & Zhang, C. (2012). Circulating MicroRNAs: a novel class of biomarkers to diagnose and monitor human cancers. Medicinal Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.20215

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.