The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies
Open accessAbstract
Background: In protein engineering, site-directed mutagenesis methods are used to generate DNA sequences with mutated codons, insertions or deletions. In a widely used method, mutations are generated by PCR using a pair of oligonucleotide primers designed with mismatching nucleotides at the center of the primers. In this method, primer-primer annealing may prevent cloning of mutant cDNAs. To circumvent this problem we developed an alternative procedure that does not use forward-reverse primer pair in the same reaction. Results: In initial studies we used a double-primer PCR mutagenesis protocol, but sequencing of products showed tandem repeats of primer in cloned DNA. We developed an alternative method that starts with two Single-Primer Reactions IN Parallel using high-fidelity Pwo DNA polymerase. Thus, we call the method with the acronym SPRINP. The SPRINP reactions are then combined, denatured at 95°C, and slowly cooled, promoting random annealing of the parental DNA and the newly synthesized strands. The products are digested with DpnI that digests methylated parental strands, and then transformed into E. coli. Using this method we generated >40 mutants in cDNAs coding for human Epithelial Na+ Channel (ENaC) subunits. The method has been tested for 1–3 bp codon mutation and insertion of a 27 bp epitope tag into cDNAs. Conclusion: The SPRINP mutagenesis protocol yields mutants reliably and with high fidelity. The use of a single primer in each amplification reaction increases the probability of success of primers relative to previous methods employing a forward and reverse primer pair in the same reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances and prospects in metabolic engineering of Zymomonas mobilis
Wang, X., He, Q., Yang, Y., Wang, J., Haning, K., Hu, Y., Wu, B., He, M., Zhang, Y., Bao, J., et al. (2018) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.001 · Cited by 154
Sharma, S., Hartmann, J. D., Watzinger, P., Klepper, A., Peifer, C., Kötter, P., Lafontaine, D. L. J., & Entian, K.-D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30383-z · Cited by 60
Metal-sensing properties of the disordered loop from the Arabidopsis metal transceptor IRT1
Cointry, V., Ródenas, R., Morellet, N., Fanara, S., Cotelle, V., Neveu, J., & Vert, G. (2025) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20240685 · Cited by 12
Self-stabilization mechanism encoded by a bacterial toxin facilitates reproductive parasitism
Harumoto, T. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.032 · Cited by 12
Valderrama‐Martín, J. M., Ortigosa, F., Aledo, J. C., Ávila, C., Cánovas, F. M., & Cañas, R. A. (2023) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.16113 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Edelheit, O., Hanukoglu, A., & Hanukoglu, I.
- Venue
- BMC Biotechnology
- Published
- 2009-06-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-61
- ISSN
- 1472-6750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156657815
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6750-9-61
- The paper
- Edelheit, O., Hanukoglu, A., & Hanukoglu, I. (2009). Simple and efficient site-directed mutagenesis using two single-primer reactions in parallel to generate mutants for protein structure-function studies. BMC Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-9-61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.