Cited by 25Natural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseMedicinal Plant Research

Effects of rhaponticum carthamoides versus glycyrrhiza glabra and punica granatum extracts on metabolic syndrome signs in rats

Open access
Dushkin, Michael, Khrapova, Marina, Kovshik, Gennadiy, Chasovskikh, Marina, Menshchikova, Elena, Trufakin, Valeriy, Shurlygina, Anna, Vereschagin, Evgeniy·2014·BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rhaponticum cathamoides (RC) is an endemic wild Siberian herb with marked medicinal properties that are still poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic potential of RC extract (ERC) compared to the effects of Glycyrrhiza glabra (EGG) and Punica granatum extracts (EPG) in a rat model with high-fat diet-(HFD)-induced signs of metabolic syndrome; therefore, this study addresses a significant global public health problem. METHODS: Six-month-old male Wistar Albino Glaxo rats were subjected to eight weeks of a standard diet (SD), HFD, or HFD in which ERC, EGG, or EPG powders were incorporated at 300 mg/kg/day. The serum lipid profile, corticosterone and cytokine concentrations, glucose tolerance, systolic blood pressure, triacylglycerol accumulation, and PPARα DNA-binding activities in the liver samples were determined. RESULTS: In contrast to EGG and EPG, an ERC supplement significantly reduced the weight of epididymal tissue (19.0%, p < 0.01) and basal serum glucose level (19.4%, p < 0.05). ERC improved glucose intolerance as well as dyslipidemia more efficiently than EGG and EPG. EGG but not ERC or EPG supplementation decreased systolic blood pressure by 12.0% (p < 0.05). All of the tested extracts reduced serum IL6 and corticosterone levels induced by HFD. However, the lowering effects of ERC consumption on the serum TNF-α level and its restoring effect on the adrenal corticosterone level significantly exceeded the improvements induced by EGG and EPG. ERC intake also reduced triacylglycerol accumulation and increased the PPARα DNA-binding activity in the liver more significantly than EGG and EPG. CONCLUSIONS: ERC powder supplementation improved glucose and lipid metabolism more significantly than EGG and EPG in rats fed on HFD, supporting the strategy of R. carthamoides use for safe relief of metabolic syndrome and its related disturbances such as inflammation, stress, and hepatic steatosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6882-14-33

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo investigations of Rhaponticum carthamoides include cognitive function effects, metabolic regulation, stress management, and cytotoxicity.

    “These investigations include a wide range of activities, such as cognitive function effects, metabolic regulation, stress management, and cytotoxicity [44,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142].”

    From Ecdysterone and Turkesterone—Compounds with Prominent Potential in Sport and Healthy Nutrition (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

    The Conclusions (page not available) report improved glucose and lipid metabolism in high-fat-diet-fed rats, and the Results section on corticosterone reports changes relevant to a physiological stress response. The paper does not investigate cognitive function or cytotoxicity; its finding of no visible toxicity is not a cytotoxicity study. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are no observable indications or symptoms of toxicity for Rhaponticum carthamoides, indicating a wide margin of safety.

    “There are no observable indications or symptoms of toxicity, indicating a wide margin of safety [44,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142].”

    From Ecdysterone and Turkesterone—Compounds with Prominent Potential in Sport and Healthy Nutrition (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

    The Conclusions report no visible signs or symptoms of toxicity and a high margin of safety, but specifically for Rhaponticum carthamoides root extract in high-fat-diet-fed rats. The claim omits those limits and reads as a general safety statement about the plant. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dushkin et al. observed that treatment with Rhaponticum carthamoides extract significantly improved glucose and lipid metabolism compared to other extracts.

    “They observed that treatment with R. carthamoides extract significantly improved glucose and lipid metabolism compared to the other extracts [135].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Laksmidevi N Maharadeva MS Prakash HS Niranjana SR Diabetes and medical plants-a review Int J Pharm Biomed Sci 2011 2 3 65 80

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dushkin, M., Khrapova, M., Kovshik, G., Chasovskikh, M., Menshchikova, E., Trufakin, V., Shurlygina, A., & Vereschagin, E.
Affiliations
Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine (RU)
Corresponding author
Dushkin, Michael
Venue
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Published
2014-01-20
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
33-33
ISSN
1472-6882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076952444
Cited by
25
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
Rhaponticum carthamoides, licorice, Punica granatum, metabolic syndrome, high-fat diet, plant extracts, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, PPARα, TNF-α, interleukin-6, corticosterone, blood pressure, serum lipids, anti-inflammatory activity
MeSH terms
Mesothelin, Animals, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Disease Models, Animal, Fatty Liver, Glycyrrhiza, Liver, Male, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Triglycerides, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Rats, Wistar, Glucose Intolerance, Dietary Supplements, Metabolic Syndrome, Lythraceae, Leuzea, PPAR alpha, Lipid Metabolism, Diet, High-Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review