The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making
Open accessAbstract
Background: Planning for the next pandemic influenza outbreak is underway in hospitals across the world. The global SARS experience has taught us that ethical frameworks to guide decision-making may help to reduce collateral damage and increase trust and solidarity within and between health care organisations. Good pandemic planning requires reflection on values because science alone cannot tell us how to prepare for a public health crisis. Discussion: In this paper, we present an ethical framework for pandemic influenza planning. The ethical framework was developed with expertise from clinical, organisational and public health ethics and validated through a stakeholder engagement process. The ethical framework includes both substantive and procedural elements for ethical pandemic influenza planning. The incorporation of ethics into pandemic planning can be helped by senior hospital administrators sponsoring its use, by having stakeholders vet the framework, and by designing or identifying decision review processes. We discuss the merits and limits of an applied ethical framework for hospital decision-making, as well as the robustness of the framework. Summary: The need for reflection on the ethical issues raised by the spectre of a pandemic influenza outbreak is great. Our efforts to address the normative aspects of pandemic planning in hospitals have generated interest from other hospitals and from the governmental sector. The framework will require re-evaluation and refinement and we hope that this paper will generate feedback on how to make it even more robust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Led to the Nigerian Boycott of the Polio Vaccination Campaign?
Jegede, A. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040073 · Cited by 490
Stawicki, S., Jeanmonod, R., Miller, A., Paladino, L., Gaieski, D., Yaffee, A., De Wulf, A., Grover, J., Papadimos, T., Bloem, C., et al. (2020) · Journal of Global Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4103/jgid.jgid_86_20 · Cited by 373
Ethical justification for conducting public health surveillance without patient consent
Lee, L. M., Heilig, C. M., & White, A. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300297 · Cited by 108
Zhu, J., Brenna, C. T. A., McCoy, L. G., Atkins, C. G. K., & Das, S. (2022) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-022-00749-0 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, A. K., Faith, K., Gibson, J. L., & Upshur, R. E.
- Venue
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- E12-E12
- ISSN
- 1472-6939 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1946608582
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1472-6939-7-12
- The paper
- Thompson, A. K., Faith, K., Gibson, J. L., & Upshur, R. E. (2006). Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-7-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.