Cited by 109Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePublic Health Policies and EducationEthics in Clinical Research

Ethical justification for conducting public health surveillance without patient consent

Open access
Lee, Lisa M., Heilig, Charles M., White, Angela·2012·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Public health surveillance by necessity occurs without explicit patient consent. There is strong legal and scientific support for maintaining name-based reporting of infectious diseases and other types of public health surveillance. We present conditions under which surveillance without explicit patient consent is ethically justifiable using principles of contemporary clinical and public health ethics. Overriding individual autonomy must be justified in terms of the obligation of public health to improve population health, reduce inequities, attend to the health of vulnerable and systematically disadvantaged persons, and prevent harm. In addition, data elements collected without consent must represent the minimal necessary interference, lead to effective public health action, and be maintained securely.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2011.300297

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L. M., Heilig, C. M., & White, A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2021917448
Cited by
108
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
disease surveillance, patient consent, moral justification, individual autonomy, infectious disease surveillance, population health, health disparities, vulnerable populations, harm prevention, data security
MeSH terms
Bioethics, Humans, Informed Consent, Population Surveillance, Public Health, Risk, Social Responsibility, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review