Cited by 50Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyElectronic Health Records SystemsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Barriers to the use of reminder/recall interventions for immunizations: a systematic review

Open access
the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Vaccine Coverage Theme Group, Pereira, Jennifer A, Quach, Susan, Heidebrecht, Christine L, Quan, Sherman D, Kolbe, Faron, Finkelstein, Michael, Kwong, Jeffrey C·2012·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have demonstrated the benefits of reminder/recall (RR) measures to address patient under-immunization and improve immunization coverage, they are not widely implemented by healthcare providers. We identified providers' perceived barriers to their use from existing literature. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of relevant articles published in English between January 1990 and July 2011 that examined the perceptions of healthcare providers regarding barriers to tracking patient immunization history and implementing RR interventions. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Academic Search Premier, and PsychINFO. Additional strategies included hand-searching the references of pertinent articles and related reviews, and searching keywords in Google Scholar and Google. RESULTS: Ten articles were included; all described populations in the United States, and examined perceptions of family physicians, pediatricians, and other immunization staff. All articles were of moderate-high methodological quality; the majority (n=7) employed survey methodology. The most frequently described barriers involved the perceived human and financial resources associated with implementing an RR intervention, as well as low confidence in the accuracy of patient immunization records, given the lack of data sharing between multiple immunization providers. Changes to staff workflow, lack of appropriate electronic patient-tracking functionalities, and uncertainty regarding the success of RR interventions were also viewed as barriers to their adoption. CONCLUSIONS: Although transitioning to electronic immunization records and registries should facilitate the implementation of RR interventions, numerous perceived barriers must still be overcome before the full benefits of these methods can be realized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6947-12-145

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Vaccine Coverage Theme Group, Pereira, J. A., Quach, S., Heidebrecht, C. L., Quan, S. D., Kolbe, F., Finkelstein, M., & Kwong, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Public Health Ontario (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Toronto Public Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Pereira, Jennifer A
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2012-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
145-145
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004630435
Cited by
50
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Public Health Agency
  • University of Toronto
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
childhood immunization, vaccination coverage, underimmunization, healthcare provider perceptions, implementation barriers, immunization records, immunization registry, general practitioners, pediatricians
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Immunization Schedule, United States, Reminder Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review