Cited by 1,675Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationHealthcare Policy and Management

Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, And Costs

Hillestad, Richard, Bigelow, James, Bower, Anthony, Girosi, Federico, Meili, Robin, Scoville, Richard, Taylor, Roger·2005·Health Affairs

Abstract

To broadly examine the potential health and financial benefits of health information technology (HIT), this paper compares health care with the use of IT in other industries. It estimates potential savings and costs of widespread adoption of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, models important health and safety benefits, and concludes that effective EMR implementation and networking could eventually save more than $81 billion annually--by improving health care efficiency and safety--and that HIT-enabled prevention and management of chronic disease could eventually double those savings while increasing health and other social benefits. However, this is unlikely to be realized without related changes to the health care system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing literature on the benefits of electronic records is largely U.S. or primary care based and reports potential rather than actual benefits, with a large proportion of this evidence reporting the potential for electronic records to improve patient safety.

    “Existing literature on the benefits of electronic records is largely U.S or primary care based [18–34] and reports ‘potential’ rather than actual benefits; with a large proportion of this evidence reporting the potential for electronic records to improve patient safety [19, 21, 23, 27–30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Meili, R., Scoville, R., & Taylor, R.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2005-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
1103-1117
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2141847884
Cited by
1,675
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 113 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 145 · 2012: 127
FWCI
102.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
electronic health records, health information technology, health care costs, cost reduction, health care efficiency, patient safety, chronic disease prevention, chronic disease management, health care reform, information technology adoption, health benefits
MeSH terms
Aged, Cost Control, Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Health Expenditures, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Health Care, United States, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Efficiency, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review