Cited by 232Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Towards pervasive computing in health care – A literature review

Open access
Orwat, Carsten, Graefe, Andreas, Faulwasser, Timm·2008·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evolving concepts of pervasive computing, ubiquitous computing and ambient intelligence are increasingly influencing health care and medicine. Summarizing published research, this literature review provides an overview of recent developments and implementations of pervasive computing systems in health care. It also highlights some of the experiences reported in deployment processes. METHODS: There is no clear definition of pervasive computing in the current literature. Thus specific inclusion criteria for selecting articles about relevant systems were developed. Searches were conducted in four scientific databases alongside manual journal searches for the period of 2002 to 2006. Articles included present prototypes, case studies and pilot studies, clinical trials and systems that are already in routine use. RESULTS: The searches identified 69 articles describing 67 different systems. In a quantitative analysis, these systems were categorized into project status, health care settings, user groups, improvement aims, and systems features (i.e., component types, data gathering, data transmission, systems functions). The focus is on the types of systems implemented, their frequency of occurrence and their characteristics. Qualitative analyses were performed of deployment issues, such as organizational and personnel issues, privacy and security issues, and financial issues. This paper provides a comprehensive access to the literature of the emerging field by addressing specific topics of application settings, systems features, and deployment experiences. CONCLUSION: Both an overview and an analysis of the literature on a broad and heterogeneous range of systems are provided. Most systems are described in their prototype stages. Deployment issues, such as implications on organization or personnel, privacy concerns, or financial issues are mentioned rarely, though their solution is regarded as decisive in transferring promising systems to a stage of regular operation. There is a need for further research on the deployment of pervasive computing systems, including clinical studies, economic and social analyses, user studies, etc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6947-8-26

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of sufficient security mechanisms to support trust between providers and patients and technical measures to ensure systems compliance with data protection laws were shown to promote implementation.

    “The presence of sufficient security mechanisms to support trust between providers and patients [34] and technical measures to ensure systems compliance with data protection laws [84] were shown to promote implementation.”

    From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Results (Deployment issues; page unavailable) report that some systems used technical measures to ensure compliance with data protection laws. The paper does not show that those measures promoted implementation; its Discussion links privacy protection more generally to acceptance. The separate claim about trust between providers and patients is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Additional workload caused by the implementation of new complex interventions hindered adoption.

    “Additional workload caused by the implementation of new complex interventions was also found to hinder adoption [17, 31, 44, 54, 66, 81, 84].”
  • Physician resistance to e-health implementation is related to fear of, dissatisfaction with, and uncertainty over new roles and responsibilities created by the introduction of e-health systems.

    “Physician resistance to e-health implementation is reported by several studies to be related to fear of [18], dissatisfaction with [18] and uncertainty over [43, 47] new roles and responsibilities, created by the introduction of e-health systems [18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alcañiz M Rey B Riva G, Vatalaro F, Davide F, Alcañiz M New Technologies For Ambient Intelligence The Evolution of Technology, Communication and Cognition Towards the Future of Human-Computer Interaction 2005 Amsterdam: IOS Press 3 15
  2. Schrooyen F Baert I Truijen S Pieters L Denis T Williame K Weyn M Real Time Location System over WiFi in a Healthcare Environment Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare 2006 4 401 416
  3. Hanada E Inaba S Nose Y A Blood Bag Temperature Monitoring Device to Improve Transfusion Practice Journal on Information Technology in Healthcare 2003 1 211 220
  4. Steenkeste F Banerjee S Courturier P Telesurveillance of Geriatric Patients in a Hospital Using Passive Infra-red Sensors Journal of Information Technology in Healthcare 2005 3 89 100

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orwat, C., Graefe, A., & Faulwasser, T.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Orwat, Carsten
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2008-06-19
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102541915
Cited by
232
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • tub.dok (Hamburg University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (16I1546)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
ubiquitous computing, ambient intelligence, health information systems, privacy and security, financial issues, prototype system, clinical implementation
MeSH terms
Computer Systems, Medical Informatics Applications, Medical Informatics Computing, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review