Cited by 38Primary Care and Health OutcomesGlobal Health Workforce IssuesHealthcare Systems and Practices

How do small rural primary health care services sustain themselves in a constantly changing health system environment?

Open access
Buykx, Penny, Humphreys, John S, Tham, Rachel, Kinsman, Leigh, Wakerman, John, Asaid, Adel, Tuohey, Kathy·2012·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to sustain comprehensive primary health care (PHC) services in the face of change is crucial to the health of rural communities. This paper illustrates how one service has proactively managed change to remain sustainable. METHODS: A 6-year longitudinal evaluation of the Elmore Primary Health Service (EPHS) located in rural Victoria, Australia, is currently underway, examining the performance, quality and sustainability of the service. Threats to, and enablers of, sustainability have been identified from evaluation data (audit of service indicators, community surveys, key stakeholder interviews and focus groups) and our own observations. These are mapped against an overarching framework of service sustainability requirements: workforce organisation and supply; funding; governance, management and leadership; service linkages; and infrastructure. RESULTS: Four years into the evaluation, the evidence indicates EPHS has responded effectively to external and internal changes to ensure viability. The specific steps taken by the service to address risks and capitalise on opportunities are identified. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation highlights lessons for health service providers, policymakers, consumers and researchers about the importance of ongoing monitoring of sentinel service indicators; being attentive to changes that have an impact on sustainability; maintaining community involvement; and succession planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-12-81

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our experiences collaborating with rural primary healthcare teams to develop and implement the memory clinics highlighted the complex nature of the rural healthcare context and are consistent with the view of innovation as an unpredictable journey and a process of managing and supporting continuous improvement and adaptation.

    “Our experiences in collaborating with rural PHC teams to develop and implement the memory clinics have highlighted the complex nature of the rural healthcare context [51] and are consistent with the view of innovation as an unpredictable journey, and a process of managing and supporting continuous improvement and adaptation [40].”
  • Organizational and leadership support are important for sustaining small rural primary healthcare services and programs in low-resource contexts.

    “Organizational and leadership support have been identified as important for sustaining small rural PHC services [51] and programs in low-resource contexts [47] and were particularly relevant to implementing this team-based intervention in a rural setting.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buykx, P., Humphreys, J. S., Tham, R., Kinsman, L., Wakerman, J., Asaid, A., & Tuohey, K.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Bendigo Health (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Buykx, Penny
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2012-03-26
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
81-81
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096123402
Cited by
38
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Australian Rotary Health
  • Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
rural health care, comprehensive primary health care, health system transformation, health care financing, health service governance, community participation, succession planning
MeSH terms
Workforce, Community-Institutional Relations, Comprehensive Health Care, Humans, Leadership, Longitudinal Studies, National Health Programs, Organizational Innovation, Organizational Objectives, Primary Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Victoria, Models, Organizational, Efficiency, Organizational, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Rural Health Services, Narration, Capacity Building

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review