Cited by 6Global Health Workforce IssuesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Systems and Practices

Meeting the primary healthcare needs of small rural communities: lessons for health service planners

Open access
Russell, Deborah, Humphreys, John·2016·Rural and Remote Health

Abstract

Introduction: The struggle of many small rural and remote communities to sustain comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) services is an issue of global interest.Recent research has identified essential service requirements (workforce, funding, management, linkages, and infrastructure) and environmental enablers (supportive policies, Commonwealth and state/territory relations, community readiness) associated with the provision of high-quality PHC services in these communities.However, little is known about how best to expand the provision of core high-quality PHC services to the many small and diverse non-metropolitan communities that currently lack them.This study investigates the transition of an integrated model of PHC service delivery, which provided PHC services to a single community, to a rurally 'networked' model of PHC delivering PHC to multiple communities.It seeks to enhance understanding of the factors and processes enabling and impeding successful PHC service expansion into small rural communities.Salient lessons for other rural health services seeking to expand into neighbouring small rural communities are proffered.Methods: This mixed-methods study of the expansion of Elmore Primary Health Service in northern Victoria, Australia, into eight neighbouring rural communities was conducted using audio-recorded semi-structured interviews with members of staff (n=11).Staff members were purposively sampled according to their knowledge and experience of the expansion, ensuring that a broad range of perspectives were captured and that these related to each of the eight sites.Additionally, interviewees completed a questionnaire indicating the importance of 16 different factors to the service expansion.Results: Community engagement, vision and leadership, linkages with other health services, improving residents' access to PHC, broadening the range of care provided and professional satisfaction were each identified by almost all participants (>90%) as having very important associations with successful expansion.A conceptual model with five distinctive stages was developed to explain the processes underpinning PHC service expansion: initiative, consultation, roll-out, evaluation and consolidation.Previously identified essential service requirements and key environmental enablers come in to play at different stages of expansion.Working closely with communities and community stakeholders, however, is critically important at all stages of expansion.The expansion of the Elmore Primary Health Service to a regionally 'networked' PHC model conferred substantial benefits by virtue of the assistance that could be provided to individual services to effectively manage change and meet essential service requirements in rapidly changing circumstances.Conclusions: This evaluation of a 'networked' model of PHC in rural areas identified the factors and processes underpinning service expansion during five distinct stages, represented in a conceptual model of service expansion.The full range of key environmental enablers and essential service requirements were very important for successful expansion, particularly during roll-out and consolidation stages, whilst community engagement was important at all stages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22605/rrh3695

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Review and evaluation of Australian information about primary health care: a focus on general practice. Canberra: AIHW, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, D., & Humphreys, J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Rural and Remote Health
Published
2016-03-09
ISSN
1445-6354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2551850445
Cited by
6
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Rural and Remote Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
primary care, rural health care, service expansion, small rural communities, community participation, healthcare leadership, primary care access, healthcare workers, health planning, job satisfaction, health management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review