Cited by 106Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Determinants of Cervical screening services uptake among 18–49 year old women seeking services at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kisumu, Kenya

Open access
Morema, Everlyne N, Atieli, Harrysone E, Onyango, Rosebella O, Omondi, Joyce H, Ouma, Collins·2014·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

Background: Kenyan women aged ≥15 years are at risk of developing cervical cancer. Currently, cervical cytology reduces cervical cancer incidence, since it allows for early diagnosis and treatment. Uptake of cervical screening services is a priority research area in Kenya. Central to the success of any screening programme is its ability to identify, reach out and screen the defined target population. Cervical screening coverage in Kenya is currently at 3.2%. In Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital (JOOTRH) in Nyanza, the number screened for cervical cancer is low (averagely 3/day). Thus the current study sought to identify factors influencing uptake of cervical screening services at the facility. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, knowledge, perceptions and cues for action associated with self-reported cervical screening uptake were explored. The targeted population (n = 424), purposively selected were women of child-bearing age (18–49 years) visiting JOOTRH. Data on socio-demographic status (age, level of education, marital status, job status, income level), knowledge of cervical cancer, perceptions on severity and susceptibility to the disease were collected using self-administered structured questionnaires. Statistical significance of differences in proportions were determined by chi-square analyses while logistic regression analyses were used to identify determinants of self-reported uptake of the service. Results: Self-reported screening uptake was 17.5%. There was a strong positive association between age (P < 0.0001), level of education (P < 0.0001) and income levels (P = 0.005) with the uptake of the service. Knowledge level on the signs and symptoms of cervical cancer was an important determinant for being screened for cervical cancer (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, those who said they didn’t know about the disease (OR, 26.84, 95% CI, 6.07-118.61, P < 0.0001) or were not aware about susceptibility to it (OR, 2.37, 95% CI, 1.10-5.08, P = 0.02) had a higher likelihood of not being screened. On cues for action, those who attended the child welfare clinic were more likely to be screened (OR, 2.31, 95% CI, 1.17-3.93, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Knowledge, perception of higher susceptibility and attending child welfare clinic are key determinants of self-reported uptake of cervical screening. Increasing knowledge, enhancing health education and providing free services may increase uptake among women population in such settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6963-14-335

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who expressed personal susceptibility to cervical cancer believed it was necessary to have HPV self-test done and vice versa to those who expressed lack of personal susceptibility.

    “and for women who expressed personal susceptibility to cervical cancer believed it was necessary to have HPV self- test done and vice versa to those who expressed lack of personal susceptibility [44–46].”

    From Perspectives of women participating in a cervical cancer screening campaign with community-based HPV self-sampling in rural western Kenya: a qualitative study (2019) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results table on perceived susceptibility and the Conclusions report that women who did not perceive themselves as susceptible were less likely to have been screened for cervical cancer (page not provided). The paper measures self-reported cervical screening uptake, not whether women believed an HPV self-test was necessary; that specific belief and test are not supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]MOH Ministry of Health: Review of the 2004–2008 reproductive health research agenda proposed 2010–2014 research agenda 2010
  2. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/335/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morema, E. N., Atieli, H. E., Onyango, R. O., Omondi, J. H., & Ouma, C.
Affiliations
  • Maseno University (KE)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
Corresponding author
Ouma, Collins
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2014-08-06
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
335-335
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160051381
Cited by
103
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening uptake, cervical cytology, cervical cancer knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, health beliefs, socioeconomic factors, women of reproductive age, Kenya, Nyanza, health care utilization, cervical cancer prevention, health education needs assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Kenya, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Incidence, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review