The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates
Open accessAbstract
This article describes the use of biofilm reactors for the production of various chemicals by fermentation and wastewater treatment. Biofilm formation is a natural process where microbial cells attach to the support (adsorbent) or form flocs/aggregates (also called granules) without use of chemicals and form thick layers of cells known as "biofilms." As a result of biofilm formation, cell densities in the reactor increase and cell concentrations as high as 74 gL-1 can be achieved. The reactor configurations can be as simple as a batch reactor, continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR), packed bed reactor (PBR), fluidized bed reactor (FBR), airlift reactor (ALR), upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, or any other suitable configuration. In UASB granular biofilm particles are used. This article demonstrates that reactor productivities in these reactors have been superior to any other reactor types. This article describes production of ethanol, butanol, lactic acid, acetic acid/vinegar, succinic acid, and fumaric acid in addition to wastewater treatment in the biofilm reactors. As the title suggests, biofilm reactors have high potential to be employed in biotechnology/bioconversion industry for viable economic reasons. In this article, various reactor types have been compared for the above bioconversion processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Cited by
Integrating micro-algae into wastewater treatment: a review
Mohsenpour, S. F., Hennige, S., Willoughby, N., Adeloye, A., & Gutierrez, T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142168 · Cited by 828
Nguyen, P. Q., Courchesne, N. D., Duraj‐Thatte, A., Praveschotinunt, P., & Joshi, N. S. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201704847 · Cited by 566
Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation.
Daniell, J., Köpke, M., & Simpson, S. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5125372 · Cited by 444
A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers
Malusá, E., & Vassilev, N. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5828-y · Cited by 332
Butanol production from renewable biomass by clostridia
Jang, Y.-S., Malaviya, A., Cho, C., Lee, J., & Lee, S. Y. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.104 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Qureshi, N., Annous, B. A., Ezeji, T. C., Karcher, P., & Maddox, I. S.
- Venue
- Microbial Cell Factories
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-24
- ISSN
- 1475-2859 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164832169
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1475-2859-4-24
- The paper
- Qureshi, N., Annous, B. A., Ezeji, T. C., Karcher, P., & Maddox, I. S. (2005). Biofilm reactors for industrial bioconversion processes: employing potential of enhanced reaction rates. Microbial Cell Factories. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-4-24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.