Cited by 444Biofuel production and bioconversionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation.

Open access
Daniell, James, Köpke, Michael, Simpson, Séan·2012·Energies

Abstract

The use of gas fermentation for the production of low carbon biofuels such as ethanol or butanol from lignocellulosic biomass is an area currently undergoing intensive research and development, with the first commercial units expected to commence operation in the near future. In this process, biomass is first converted into carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2)-rich synthesis gas (syngas) via gasification, and subsequently fermented to hydrocarbons by acetogenic bacteria. Several studies have been performed over the last few years to optimise both biomass gasification and syngas fermentation with significant progress being reported in both areas. While challenges associated with the scale-up and operation of this novel process remain, this strategy offers numerous advantages compared with established fermentation and purely thermochemical approaches to biofuel production in terms of feedstock flexibility and production cost. In recent times, metabolic engineering and synthetic biology techniques have been applied to gas fermenting organisms, paving the way for gases to be used as the feedstock for the commercial production of increasingly energy dense fuels and more valuable chemicals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en5125372

Cites

224 of 224 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Syngas fermentation has advantages over other second-generation approaches: high feedstock flexibility and high rates of energy and carbon capture.

    “Advantages of syngas fermentation compared to other second-generation approaches are high feedstock flexibility as well as high rates of energy and carbon capture.”

    From The potential of biofuels from first to fourth generation (2023) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bacovsky, D.; Dallos, M.; Wörgetter, M. Status of 2nd Generation Biofuels Demonstration Facilities in June 2010; IEA Bioenergy Task 39; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2010; pp. 1-126.
  2. E4Tech. Review of Technologies for Gasification of Biomass and Wastes; NNFCC Project 09/008 Final Report; NNFCC: York Science Park, UK, 2009.
  3. Wiegel, J.; Carreira, L.H.; Garrison, R.; Rabek, N.E.; Ljungdahl, L.G. Calcium magnesium acetate (CMA) manufacture from glucose by fermentation with thermophilic homoacetogenic bacteria. In Calcium Magnesium Acetate; Wise, D.L., Lavendis, Y.A., Metghalchi, M., Eds.; Elsevier Science Publisher: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 359-418. 146.
  4. William, J.R. Securities and Exchange Commission. Coskata, Inc.: Warrenville, IL, USA, Available online: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1536893/000119312511343587/d267854ds1.htm (accessed on 9 July 2012). 219. Tirado-Acevedo, O. Production of Bioethanol from Synthesis Gas Using Clostridium ljungdahlii. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA, 17 November 2010. 220. Koepke, M.; Liew, F. Production of Butanol from Carbon Monoxide by a Recombinant Microorganism. Patent WO/2012/053905, 26 April 2012. 221.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniell, J., Köpke, M., & Simpson, S.
Affiliations
LanzaTech (New Zealand) (NZ)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Séan
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2012-12-19
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
5372-5417
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973808917
Cited by
444
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
syngas fermentation, gas fermentation, lignocellulosic biomass, biofuels, ethanol production, butanol production, biomass gasification, acetogenic bacteria, metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, scale-up, process economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review