The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of different vaccine delivery systems for cancer therapy
Open accessAbstract
Cancer vaccines are the promising tools in the hands of the clinical oncologist. Many tumor-associated antigens are excellent targets for immune therapy and vaccine design. Optimally designed cancer vaccines should combine the best tumor antigens with the most effective immunotherapy agents and/or delivery strategies to achieve positive clinical results. Various vaccine delivery systems such as different routes of immunization and physical/chemical delivery methods have been used in cancer therapy with the goal to induce immunity against tumor-associated antigens. Two basic delivery approaches including physical delivery to achieve higher levels of antigen production and formulation with microparticles to target antigen-presenting cells (APCs) have demonstrated to be effective in animal models. New developments in vaccine delivery systems will improve the efficiency of clinical trials in the near future. Among them, nanoparticles (NPs) such as dendrimers, polymeric NPs, metallic NPs, magnetic NPs and quantum dots have emerged as effective vaccine adjuvants for infectious diseases and cancer therapy. Furthermore, cell-penetrating peptides (CPP) have been known as attractive carrier having applications in drug delivery, gene transfer and DNA vaccination. This review will focus on the utilization of different vaccine delivery systems for prevention or treatment of cancer. We will discuss their clinical applications and the future prospects for cancer vaccine development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA vaccines: ready for prime time?
Kutzler, M. A., & Weiner, D. B. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2432 · Cited by 1,077
Cited by
Assessment of the Evolution of Cancer Treatment Therapies
Arruebo, M., Vilaboa, N., Sáez-Gutierrez, B., Lambea, J., Tres, A., Valladares, M., & González-Fernández, Á. (2011) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers3033279 · Cited by 931
Reissmann, S. (2014) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2672 · Cited by 266
Kim, H., Seo, E.-H., Lee, S.-H., & Kim, B.-J. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17122054 · Cited by 48
Davtyan, H., Chen, W. W., Zagorski, K., Davis, J., Petrushina, I., Kazarian, K., Cribbs, D. H., Agadjanyan, M. G., Blurton-Jones, M., & Ghochikyan, A. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.020 · Cited by 30
Production of recombinant immunotherapeutics for anticancer treatment: The role of bioengineering
Pranchevicius, M.-C. S., & Vieira, T. R. (2013) · Bioengineered · doi:10.4161/bioe.24666 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolhassani, A., Safaiyan, S., & Rafati, S.
- Venue
- Molecular Cancer
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3
- ISSN
- 1476-4598 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105107872
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement of different vaccine delivery systems for cancer therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1476-4598-10-3
- The paper
- Bolhassani, A., Safaiyan, S., & Rafati, S. (2011). Improvement of different vaccine delivery systems for cancer therapy. Molecular Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-10-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.