Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of meal preparation training on body weight, glycemia, and blood pressure: results of a phase 2 trial in type 2 diabetes

Dasgupta, Kaberi, Hajna, Samantha, Joseph, Lawrence, Da Costa, Deborah, Christopoulos, Stavroula, Gougeon, Rejeanne·2012·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-5868-9-125

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized clinical trials evaluating culinary medicine interventions on adults with cardiometabolic risk factors found short-term improvement in weight.

    “Randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of CM interventions on adults with cardiometabolic risk factors found short‐term improvement in vegetable intake [18], Mediterranean diet score [19], and weight [20, 21].”

    From One‐Year Weight Loss Following a Remote Culinary Medicine Program: A Bi‐Center Randomized Controlled Trial (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Discussion reports a 2.2% mean weight reduction after the 24-week meal-preparation program in adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the Introduction describes a pre-intervention/post-intervention design, not a randomized controlled trial. The source supports short-term weight improvement but not the citing sentence’s characterization of this study as an RCT. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The effect observed in this study is greater compared to the short-term weight loss of up to −2.2% in other CM programs that required a teaching kitchen.

    “Despite the affordable remote delivery, this effect is greater compared to short‐term weight loss of up to −2.2% in other CM programs that required a teaching kitchen [20, 41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1503/cmaj.061409 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/ijo.2009.213 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014086 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nutd.2011.22 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.011 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01922.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.003 · DOI
  8. 10.2337/diacare.10.5.563 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/oby.2011.230 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113486.60548.E9 · DOI
  11. 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1186/1475-2840-9-81 · DOI
  13. 10.1001/jama.298.19.2296 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.3148/66.2.2005.67 · DOI
  15. 10.1108/00070700210418767 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00531.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0306-4603(96)00068-8 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61344-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00064-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/1479-5868-9-95 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02982.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dasgupta, K., Hajna, S., Joseph, L., Da Costa, D., Christopoulos, S., & Gougeon, R.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2012
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
125
ISSN
1479-5868
Cited by
32
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review