Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 791

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force

Open access
Galon, Jérôme, Pagès, Franck, Marincola, Francesco M, Angell, Helen K, Thurin, Magdalena, Lugli, Alessandro, Zlobec, Inti, Berger, Anne, Bifulco, Carlo, Botti, Gerardo, Tatangelo, Fabiana, Britten, Cedrik M, Kreiter, Sebastian, Chouchane, Lotfi, Delrio, Paolo, Arndt, Hartmann, Asslaber, Martin, Maio, Michele, Masucci, Giuseppe V, Mihm, Martin, Vidal-Vanaclocha, Fernando, Allison, James P, Gnjatic, Sacha, Hakansson, Leif, Huber, Christoph, Singh-Jasuja, Harpreet, Ottensmeier, Christian, Zwierzina, Heinz, Laghi, Luigi, Grizzi, Fabio, Ohashi, Pamela S, Shaw, Patricia A, Clarke, Blaise A, Wouters, Bradly G, Kawakami, Yutaka, Hazama, Shoichi, Okuno, Kiyotaka, Wang, Ena, O'Donnell-Tormey, Jill, Lagorce, Christine, Pawelec, Graham, Nishimura, Michael I, Hawkins, Robert, Lapointe, Réjean, Lundqvist, Andreas, Khleif, Samir N, Ogino, Shuji, Gibbs, Peter, Waring, Paul, Sato, Noriyuki, Torigoe, Toshihiko, Itoh, Kyogo, Patel, Prabhu S, Shukla, Shilin N, Palmqvist, Richard, Nagtegaal, Iris D, Wang, Yili, D'Arrigo, Corrado, Kopetz, Scott, Sinicrope, Frank A, Trinchieri, Giorgio, Gajewski, Thomas F, Ascierto, Paolo A, Fox, Bernard A·2012·Journal of Translational Medicine

Abstract

Prediction of clinical outcome in cancer is usually achieved by histopathological evaluation of tissue samples obtained during surgical resection of the primary tumor. Traditional tumor staging (AJCC/UICC-TNM classification) summarizes data on tumor burden (T), presence of cancer cells in draining and regional lymph nodes (N) and evidence for metastases (M). However, it is now recognized that clinical outcome can significantly vary among patients within the same stage. The current classification provides limited prognostic information, and does not predict response to therapy. Recent literature has alluded to the importance of the host immune system in controlling tumor progression. Thus, evidence supports the notion to include immunological biomarkers, implemented as a tool for the prediction of prognosis and response to therapy. Accumulating data, collected from large cohorts of human cancers, has demonstrated the impact of immune-classification, which has a prognostic value that may add to the significance of the AJCC/UICC TNM-classification. It is therefore imperative to begin to incorporate the 'Immunoscore' into traditional classification, thus providing an essential prognostic and potentially predictive tool. Introduction of this parameter as a biomarker to classify cancers, as part of routine diagnostic and prognostic assessment of tumors, will facilitate clinical decision-making including rational stratification of patient treatment. Equally, the inherent complexity of quantitative immunohistochemistry, in conjunction with protocol variation across laboratories, analysis of different immune cell types, inconsistent region selection criteria, and variable ways to quantify immune infiltration, all underline the urgent requirement to reach assay harmonization. In an effort to promote the Immunoscore in routine clinical settings, an international task force was initiated. This review represents a follow-up of the announcement of this initiative, and of the J Transl Med. editorial from January 2012. Immunophenotyping of tumors may provide crucial novel prognostic information. The results of this international validation may result in the implementation of the Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-I (TNM-Immune).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-5876-10-205

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 791

Metadata

Authors
Galon, J., Pagès, F., Marincola, F. M., Angell, H. K., Thurin, M., Lugli, A., Zlobec, I., Berger, A., Bifulco, C., Botti, G., Tatangelo, F., Britten, C. M., Kreiter, S., Chouchane, L., Delrio, P., Arndt, H., Asslaber, M., Maio, M., Masucci, G. V., Mihm, M., Vidal-Vanaclocha, F., Allison, J. P., Gnjatic, S., Hakansson, L., Huber, C., Singh-Jasuja, H., Ottensmeier, C., Zwierzina, H., Laghi, L., Grizzi, F., Ohashi, P. S., Shaw, P. A., Clarke, B. A., Wouters, B. G., Kawakami, Y., Hazama, S., Okuno, K., Wang, E., O'Donnell-Tormey, J., Lagorce, C., Pawelec, G., Nishimura, M. I., Hawkins, R., Lapointe, R., Lundqvist, A., Khleif, S. N., Ogino, S., Gibbs, P., Waring, P., Sato, N., Torigoe, T., Itoh, K., Patel, P. S., Shukla, S. N., Palmqvist, R., Nagtegaal, I. D., Wang, Y., D'Arrigo, C., Kopetz, S., Sinicrope, F. A., Trinchieri, G., Gajewski, T. F., Ascierto, P. A., & Fox, B. A.
Venue
Journal of Translational Medicine
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
205-205
ISSN
1479-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119301589
Cited by
791
References
3
FWCI
23.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1479-5876-10-205
The paper
Galon, J., Pagès, F., Marincola, F. M., Angell, H. K., Thurin, M., Lugli, A., Zlobec, I., Berger, A., Bifulco, C., Botti, G., Tatangelo, F., Britten, C. M., Kreiter, S., Chouchane, L., Delrio, P., Arndt, H., Asslaber, M., Maio, M., Masucci, G. V., . . . Fox, B. A. (2012). Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force. Journal of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.